24 Apr
2012
24 Apr
'12
9:54 p.m.
Le 24/04/2012 23:27, Darrell Anderson a écrit :
Sorry, I forgot to attach the patch to my previous mail. Here is the
patch for tqca-tls, working on fedora 16 x86_64 (tde r14 + tqt3) .
I am the packager for both RHEL and Fedora.
RHEL is like an "old stable Fedora", the packaging method and tools are
exactly the same, thanks to the Redhat RPM tools
That's why If you look in the git tree "tde-packaging", only the
"redhat" folder is populated.
But I have to compile my sources for each distro (currently I compile
each package 10 times: RHEL5, RHEL6, Fedora15, Fedora16, Fedora17, each
distro for both x86 and x86_64).
As a bonus, I've just done the patch for tqca (tested on fedora 16
x86_64, tde r14, tqt3). It is attached to this mail too.
I did not look yet but I guess that the trinity-python package has more
or less the same problem.
Francois
I will look
into them, but I think these packages are for
R14 and I'm focusing on 3.5.13 for now.
I've already built tqca-tls R14 with TQT3 bt writing the
attached patch (see first part).
Where do I look for the patches?
I'm okay with your patches being for 3.5.13. I can massage/adapt them to GIT. I have
been doing that regularly around here. :) Problems occur
when the "configure" script is not
autogenerated but is a static shell script, it often lacks the "lib64"
directories
in path ...
Yes, that is the case. I need to learn how to fix only one of each
(tqca or tqca-tls and python-tqt or python-trinity). After I learn to fix one of each I
should be able to do likewise for the other. The challenge with the two python packages is
the configuration scripts are written in python, which I don't know.
By the way, are your Fedora packages compatible with other Redhat spinoff releases, such
as Scientific Linux? Just curious.