-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA224
On Mon, 20 Oct 2014 17:32:53 -0400 "E. Liddell" ejlddll@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sun, 19 Oct 2014 21:10:41 -0500 "Timothy Pearson" kb9vqf@pearsoncomputing.net wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA224
Hi,
Visually, I have no problem with either using the provided false
shadow or the CSS3 one. What it does
when it is displayed in Konq-error? Does it make Konq go crazy or
it is
just not shown.
Konqueror just ignores the style instruction, because it's limited
to
CSS2. So the screenshot appears with no shadow (and a little bit of extra whitespace below it). In other words, it's harmless and downgrades
gracefully.
E. Liddell
Hi,
Well, it's okay for me to have the CSS3 shadow if it is harmless for Konqueror. These little adjustments improves a lot the website and I
think
that these changes are ready to go to production. What do you think?
Thank you! -Alexandre
OK, let's go with the CSS3 shadow and get opinions from others on the
list
regarding this design. If the consensus is that the new site is
better
then we'll put it into production.
There may be a problem with the stylesheet on screens where the main text area is shorter than the sidebar. I'm trying to figure out a fix.
Never mind, found a fix, although I'm not entirely happy with it. The revised site style is now on webdev, for those who have access. Tim, due to the rearrangement of the page's geometry, your "donate!" link has shifted out of place. I'll fix that later.
E. Liddell
Looks good overall, however I prefer the non-italicised header links. Was there any previous discussion on that UI element? If not, what is the rationale behind italicizing those links? I personally have a hard time determining they are links instead of noninteractive headers when they are italicized.
Thanks!
Tim