30 Apr
2012
30 Apr
'12
8:26 a.m.
no it doesn't. KWin provides the same level of
integration to Trinity as it
has ever done, whether you call it KWin or TWin or FooBar doesn't change
the fact that it is afterall KWin. Just for the fun of it, I just searched
for the term "kicker" in KWin's source code and it still finds 11
reference.
So no, the question whether TWin or KWin is a completely different one to
whether TWin or openbox.
Sorry, I still don't get the point. What is the "integretion" you talk
about?
Is there a testcase where you can show the advantage of kwin above any other
wm?
As I see it - from a users point of view - the only difference between twin
and any other wm is the configuration dialog. Is this valid for kwin, too?
Nik