2 Dec
2013
2 Dec
'13
11:25 p.m.
On Monday 02 of December 2013 23:49:31 Timothy Pearson wrote:
I assume that the user will either use a package kio-umountwrapper from
rename-meta => divert solves this metapackage. Or will uninstall package
kio-umountwrapper due to a conflict with tdeio-umountwrapper => diverts
solves the original package during the uninstallation.
Before commit I'll test it in Ubuntu 13.10. It takes me a little time.
At this time I tested sucessfully on Debian 6.0.
Slavek
On Monday 02
of December 2013 21:53:33 Timothy Pearson wrote:
Great, it looks good.
By the way, just coincidentally I'm also test and solve problems with
upgrade
3.5.13.x => R14 and also solve conflict of diverts kio-umountwrapper ×
tdeio-umountwrapper. Hovewer, because it seems to me wrong to deal with
diverts from foreign package, I have prepared a patch for the package
rename-meta => fix for metapackage kio-umountwrapper.
Slavek
--
Seems we were both working on the same thing then. Feel free to reverse
my commit to tde-packaging if you have a better solution. ;-)
Tim
On Sunday
10 of November 2013 06:51:43 Timothy Pearson wrote:
> > On Thursday 07 of November 2013 00:01:55 Timothy Pearson wrote:
> >> > On Sunday 13 of October 2013 22:04:32 Timothy Pearson wrote:
> >> >> > Hello all, Tim,
> >> >> >
> >> >> > in a recent test of upgrade from TDE 3.5.13.2 to R14 smooth
>
> update
>
> >> was
> >>
> >> >> > thwarted by conflicts in packages qt3 × tqt3. How should they
be
> >> >> treated?
> >> >>
> >> >> > Rename files to prevent conflicts? Or mark packages as
>
> conflicting
>
> >> /
> >>
> >> >> > replacement to allow smooth upgrade?
> >> >>
> >> >> We may need to rename the files, though this would push release
>
> back
>
> >> yet
> >>
> >> >> again. My primary concern is the complaints we would get if we
> >>
> >> blocked
> >>
> >> >> installation of Qt3 on TDE systems via the Conflicts package
>
> field.
>
> >> >> At first glance the files listed are not used by the majority
of
> TDE
>
> >> >> applications, so renaming them might not be as bad as it first
>
> looks.
>
> >> >> Let
> >> >> me see what I can do with it.
> >> >>
> >> >> Tim
> >> >
> >> > I believe that it would be good to resolve this conflicts before
> >>
> >> release
> >>
> >> > RC1.
> >> > Should I help?
> >> >
> >> > Slavek
> >>
> >> I just pushed through a commit that should resolve the majority of
>
> these
>
> >> issues. I don't know if the TDE sources will need to be updated
> >> anywhere
> >> to handle these changes; can you take a look?
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >>
> >> Tim
> >
> > I was looking for using renamed tools in the entire GIT tree, and I
>
> did
>
> > not
> > find anything where were actively used. So it looks good.
> >
> > Slavek
>
> So the Qt3/TQt3 conflicts are now sufficiently resolved for R14?
>
> Tim
Most of the conflicts were resolved, but still remain conflicts
qt3-apps-dev × tqt3-apps-dev:
qt3-apps-dev: /usr/lib/libeditor.a
qt3-apps-dev: /usr/lib/libdesignercore.a
qt3-apps-dev: /usr/lib/libqassistantclient.a
qt3-apps-dev: /usr/lib/libqassistantclient.prl
qt3-apps-dev: /usr/lib/libdesignercore.prl
qt3-apps-dev: /usr/lib/libeditor.prl
This should (finally!) be fixed in GIT.
Tim