On Monday 02 of December 2013 23:49:31 Timothy Pearson wrote:
On Monday 02 of December 2013 21:53:33 Timothy Pearson wrote:
On Sunday 10 of November 2013 06:51:43 Timothy Pearson wrote:
On Thursday 07 of November 2013 00:01:55 Timothy Pearson wrote: > > On Sunday 13 of October 2013 22:04:32 Timothy Pearson wrote: > >> > Hello all, Tim, > >> > > >> > in a recent test of upgrade from TDE 3.5.13.2 to R14 smooth
update
> was > > >> > thwarted by conflicts in packages qt3 × tqt3. How should they
be
> >> treated? > >> > >> > Rename files to prevent conflicts? Or mark packages as
conflicting
> / > > >> > replacement to allow smooth upgrade? > >> > >> We may need to rename the files, though this would push release
back
> yet > > >> again. My primary concern is the complaints we would get if we > > blocked > > >> installation of Qt3 on TDE systems via the Conflicts package
field.
> >> At first glance the files listed are not used by the majority
of
TDE
> >> applications, so renaming them might not be as bad as it first
looks.
> >> Let > >> me see what I can do with it. > >> > >> Tim > > > > I believe that it would be good to resolve this conflicts before > > release > > > RC1. > > Should I help? > > > > Slavek > > I just pushed through a commit that should resolve the majority of
these
> issues. I don't know if the TDE sources will need to be updated > anywhere > to handle these changes; can you take a look? > > Thanks! > > Tim
I was looking for using renamed tools in the entire GIT tree, and I
did
not find anything where were actively used. So it looks good.
Slavek
So the Qt3/TQt3 conflicts are now sufficiently resolved for R14?
Tim
Most of the conflicts were resolved, but still remain conflicts qt3-apps-dev × tqt3-apps-dev:
qt3-apps-dev: /usr/lib/libeditor.a qt3-apps-dev: /usr/lib/libdesignercore.a qt3-apps-dev: /usr/lib/libqassistantclient.a qt3-apps-dev: /usr/lib/libqassistantclient.prl qt3-apps-dev: /usr/lib/libdesignercore.prl qt3-apps-dev: /usr/lib/libeditor.prl
This should (finally!) be fixed in GIT.
Tim
Great, it looks good.
By the way, just coincidentally I'm also test and solve problems with upgrade 3.5.13.x => R14 and also solve conflict of diverts kio-umountwrapper × tdeio-umountwrapper. Hovewer, because it seems to me wrong to deal with diverts from foreign package, I have prepared a patch for the package rename-meta => fix for metapackage kio-umountwrapper.
Slavek
Seems we were both working on the same thing then. Feel free to reverse my commit to tde-packaging if you have a better solution. ;-)
Tim
I assume that the user will either use a package kio-umountwrapper from rename-meta => divert solves this metapackage. Or will uninstall package kio-umountwrapper due to a conflict with tdeio-umountwrapper => diverts solves the original package during the uninstallation.
Before commit I'll test it in Ubuntu 13.10. It takes me a little time. At this time I tested sucessfully on Debian 6.0.
Slavek