Re: [trinity-devel] Deprecate KOffice

Then please be careful with your word choice. What you have written here in the past has, from a native English speaker's point of view, sounded very antagonistic and competitive. Here is another example of what I mentioned above. Whether you realize it or not, the way this statement is phrased it is rather insulting. How an average English-speaking individual might read this would be as follows: "Since you claim to have so many resources (which I really don't think you do) then do what I suggested a long time ago, since I think it is terribly easy and cannot understand why it is so very hard for you to do." Is that really what you meant? If not then please say so! I had not considered that there may be a language issue here. To answer your question, yes, I think that is a good idea. Would you like to try your hand at it? I probably will not get around to doing so until the entire TQt4 port is complete and some of the open bugs have been addressed. The project is currently somewhat swamped; once the TQt4 port is complete and CMake support has been added, we have enough developer resources to keep things moving along quickly. However, we are still in the middle of those two operations and so are not able to absorb as many of the miscellaneous tasks (such as gcc 4.6 compilation repairs, .odf support, etc.) as you or I would like. Any help is much appreciated during this transitional period. Tim