18 Nov
2011
18 Nov
'11
4:23 a.m.
On Thursday 17 November 2011 04:15:47 pm Sanne wrote:
On Thursday 17 November 2011, Kate Draven wrote:
That's one of the main reasons we want KHTML replaced/fixed. Konqueror remains
light.
There was a Firefox fork called Flock awhile back. I don't know if it still
exists.
There's also Arora. Chromium/Chrome is becoming popular also.
--
Kristopher Gamrat
Ark Linux webmaster
http://www.arklinux.org/
I agree with everything here, especially about
konq, I also live in konq.
I do, however, like having konq as a web browser. I feel the html engine
should be fixed. Trust me there are some advantages konq has over FF as a
web browser.
Nice to know there's a kindred spirit. :)
I'm sure Konqeror can be a nice web browser also, it's just that I sorta
grew up on Firefox and got very used to its ways and great extensions,
especially for web development. I don't like the recent change in
versioning though, and it does feel a bit heavy lately.