15 Oct
2014
15 Oct
'14
9:07 a.m.
On Wednesday 15 of October 2014 10:58:58 Michele Calgaro wrote:
I will not work on this bug since I want to complete bug 1859 first and
eventually join bug 1850.
I have currently working on patches from bug 2110 and at the same time on the
modifications tdebase in tde-packaging. As a result of renaming the icons
need to be updated - now causes FTBFS.
I am afraid that with the branches is the same as with the tags - after
creating on the server branch synchronizes to users, but after remove on the
server users will have to worry about removing branch == all the users
themselves. This is not good. Therefore, I am not a fan of temporary branches
on the server.
- bug 2152: I haven't look at the details, but
based on the two commits
already made by Slavek it should not take long to fix.
Yeah, I was already looking at it. I'm tentatively working on digikam if
you or Slavek want to tackle koffice. Short answer:
If I can technically make branching work in a somewhat
intuitive manner without overloading the servers Slavek's option 2 sounds
best. This means we won't branch at this point anyway, so I have a bit
of breathing room to work on the site and such before RC1 release.
In the worst case, I think it would be a good idea to at least create a
temporary "development branch" where patches can be pushed while the
hard freeze is in place for v14.0.0. After v14.0.0 is released, the
changes made can be merged into the main trunk.
Cheers
Michele
--
Slávek