On Thursday 27 of February 2014 02:54:45 Michele Calgaro wrote:
cmake would be the preferred choice, but if not
possible autotools will do.
Of course it will require more cmake conversion time later, but better an
app with autotools than no app at all. Just my 2 cents.
Michele
First, I agree that it is better to have an application with autotools, than
not having application.
Second, because the integration of applications into GIT always start
incorporating original source code, converting to cmake will always be a
subsequent patch. So it's just a matter of how long after the initial
integration application into GIT will be pushed patch to convert to cmake.
--
Slavek