Re: [trinity-devel] digikam FTBFS - libpng15 patch regression or not applied?

27 Jun 2012

...
    (I'm confused why the preprocessor checks were not
needed.) 
 They are not needed because the original code in Digikam was
 redundant. The patch simply removed the redundancy! 
 Ok. You're dealing with a C++ dunce here, remember? I still don't grasp
 pointers, ->, this, and other C++ related weirdness.

 Because both David and I built digikam against libpng 1.5 and 1.4.9
 respectively, with the preprocessor check patch, apparently the checks did
 not cause any harm but are unnecessary.

 I guess nice try but I'm still a C++ dunce. :-)

 Darrell 
No problem. :-)  I appreciate all the work you have been putting in on
this project; even if you don't fully grasp C/C++, you are still providing
valuable services that the project needs.

Tim

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

Re: [trinity-devel] digikam FTBFS - libpng15 patch regression or not applied?