7 Feb
2014
7 Feb
'14
1:35 a.m.
On Thursday 06 of February 2014 16:46:25 David C. Rankin wrote:
On 02/05/2014 07:42 PM, Slávek Banko wrote:
The decisive reason for the move to the modules have been just avoid conflict
with the standard 'sip' and 'python-qt'.
I assume that both patches (1912, 1913) from bug 1790 can be considered as
tested => suitable for pushing to Git.
Slavek
--
Have you tried to sip4-tqt add patch 1912
(sip4-tqt : install as module
by default) from bug 1790? If patch 1912 is correct, the files should be
installed in a subfolder sip4_tqt. As follows:
tde-sip-R14preRC1-1-i686.pkg.tar.xz
usr/include/python3.3m/sip.h
usr/share/licenses/tde-sip/LICENSE
usr/bin/sip
usr/lib/python3.3/site-packages/sip4_tqt/__init__.py
usr/lib/python3.3/site-packages/sip4_tqt/sip.so
usr/lib/python3.3/site-packages/sip4_tqt/sipconfig.py
usr/lib/python3.3/site-packages/sip4_tqt/sipdistutils.py
tde-sip4-tqt-R14preRC1-1-i686.pkg.tar.xz
usr/include/python2.7/sip.h
usr/share/licenses/tde-sip4-tqt/LICENSE
usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sip4_tqt/__init__.py
usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sip4_tqt/sip.so
usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sip4_tqt/sipconfig.py
usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sip4_tqt/sipdistutils.py
Slavek
Thank you Slavek,
I have it sorted. I see the subfolder move, but do not understand why
using sip as a module instead of an executable is preferred. However, I see
the benefit in resolving the conflict with upstream sip. I've simply been
replacing the upstream 'sip' provided file with 'tde-sip' since I was
building with upstream anyway. It was just frustrating to be cramped on
time and then to run into dependency packages changing locations in the
filesystem.