13 Nov
2011
13 Nov
'11
10:59 p.m.
Ilya Chernykh wrote:
On Sunday 13 November 2011 15:46:09 Julius
Schwartzenberg wrote:
It seems originally there were mainly miscommunications between you and
Robert. He already apologized for this. Timothy is also sensitive to
criticism and the discussion continued.
Pearson has ill memory it seems. He quickly forgot all I did for Trinity to the extent to
claim
I contributed nothing.
I think I did more than just be considered "a source of headache". This
strange
property of Timothy's memory is impressing. Not long ago he assigned to me a
bugreport
to make knetworkmanager compatible with new API (after accepting a first patch from
openSUSE's KDE:KDE3). The last discussion in that bugreport
http://bugs.pearsoncomputing.net/show_bug.cgi?id=521
I agree here that Timothy's comment calling KDE:KDE3 obsolete is
inappropriate. It seems he felt your response was harsh, but this does
not make it appropriate for him to respond in such a way. I would have
only expected a response asking for a diff.
I understand it seemed inappropriate to you to be assigned to a bug in
Trinity's bugzilla?
> It is pity that such project as KDE3 was cloned by
an unstable paranoid psycho.
>
Until now i was a bystander and I didn't want to participate in this
discussion but now I'm getting feeling it's not anymore about which is
better/upstream/updated
It was never about which is better/upstream/updated.