21 Oct
2014
21 Oct
'14
2:59 a.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA224
On Mon, 20 Oct 2014 18:35:29 -0500
"Timothy Pearson" <kb9vqf(a)pearsoncomputing.net> wrote:
OK, thanks for the info. Alexandre, do you see a problem with making the
headers non-underlined and non-italic? The color differences set them
apart well enough for me.
Also, while I haven't had time to evaluate a proper overhaul of the patch
pages I have at least modified the backend so as to allow pagination.
Patches are now available by default in 100-patch lists, starting with the
newest. Everything else currently functions the same as before.
E. Liddell, now that the patches page is a little easier to work with, can
you send me an example of what the aforementioned css-driven table should
look like? I can implement the changes quickly on this end.
Thanks!
Tim
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA224
The sequence went something like this, IIRC:
A few emails back, Alexandre asked that I underline the headers, because
he
didn't think they were sufficiently differentiated.
I didn't want to underline them because I was afraid it would suggest that
the
other links weren't links, if you see what I mean, so I italicized them
instead.
It was all mixed in with the discussion about the drop shadow.
E. Liddell On Mon, 20 Oct 2014 17:32:53 -0400
"E. Liddell" <ejlddll(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Oct 2014 21:10:41 -0500
> "Timothy Pearson" <kb9vqf(a)pearsoncomputing.net> wrote:
>
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA224
> >
> > >
> > >> > Hi,
> > >> >
> > >> > Visually, I have no problem with either using the provided
false
> > >> shadow or the CSS3 one. What it
does
> > >> >when it is displayed in Konq-error? Does it make Konq go crazy
or
> it is
> > >> just not shown.
> > >>
> > >> Konqueror just ignores the style instruction, because it's
limited
> to
> > >> CSS2.
> > >> So the screenshot appears with no shadow (and a little bit of
extra
> > >> whitespace
> > >> below it). In other words, it's harmless and downgrades
> gracefully.
> > >>
> > >> E. Liddell
> > >>
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Well, it's okay for me to have the CSS3 shadow if it is harmless
for
> > > Konqueror. These little adjustments
improves a lot the website
and I
> think
> > > that these changes are ready to go to production. What do you
think?
> > >
> > > Thank you!
> > > -Alexandre
> > >
> >
> > OK, let's go with the CSS3 shadow and get opinions from others on
the
> list
> > regarding this design. If the consensus is that the new site is
> better
> > then we'll put it into production.
>
> There may be a problem with the stylesheet on screens where the main
> text area is shorter than the sidebar. I'm trying to figure out a
fix.
Never mind, found a fix, although I'm not entirely happy with it.
The revised site style is now on webdev, for those who have access.
Tim, due to the rearrangement of the page's geometry, your "donate!"
link has shifted out of place. I'll fix that later.
E. Liddell
Looks good overall, however I prefer the non-italicised header links.
Was
there any previous discussion on that UI element? If not, what is the
rationale behind italicizing those links? I personally have a hard time
determining they are links instead of noninteractive headers when they
are
italicized. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iFYEARELAAYFAlRFy/oACgkQLaxZSoRZrGGT7wDeNKBbdx2myQs6vNQnKw+jsDR/
WflFY03xW8WFNgDcDt/LEyYscndB1VfsjEm+nZDX1+r5bvBRw4FyFQ==
=VidF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----