26 Feb
2012
26 Feb
'12
12:25 a.m.
On Saturday 25 February 2012 18:06:00 Darrell Anderson wrote:
this would be ok, IMHO.
GHNS is cool.
I was thinking however, since scripts are small
in size, we could just at them as defaults. It doesn't
seem to be much overhead.
What do you guys think of that?
As I mentioned in a previous post, perhaps we vote and select a half dozen
or dozen scripts to include in the default packaging. The default is the
scripts are disabled but appear in the Settings configurations for the new
user. The remainder of any scripts we want to support could
be available at
the wiki.
well, that was the point where I think GHNS makes much more sense.
I don't think normal users would regularly search a wiki for addons for
individual applications.
This discussion now raises another point. If Trinity
supports a Get Hot New
Stuff option, should we check through all of the sources and update the URL
to a Trinity location?
agreed - this way would also prevent to point to outdated/inexistent
locations, or those which are intended for kde4 only (thus incompatible with
trinity).
Werner