20 Jun
2011
20 Jun
'11
10:32 a.m.
I would have to agree with Ilya Chernykh. While I do understand the
undertaking required to keep it, life has shown me, nothing worth
while, is ever easy. Becoming dependant on outside office suites,
which are now becoming fragmented (project fragmentation is FOSS's
kryptonite) is unwise.
I do use koffice, its has a lot of advantages OOo and its off shoots
don't. Too many to go into but avid users know.
Its something that needs to be considered patiently. Hast makes waste
and all that rot.
Thanks for listen (or reading rather)
Kate Draven
On 6/20/11, Ilya Chernykh <anixxsus(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Monday 20 June 2011 03:39:56 Timothy Pearson
wrote:
I agree with Lukas here. Unfortunately we
can't just drop koffice, as
there is at least one application within it that cannot be replaced, but
the overall goal was to save as much of the KDE3 experience as possible.
Polluting the repository with obsolete applications that perform functions
that are no longer needed in the real world
Btw, did you try to backport export/import filters from KDE4's KOffice?
They are fairly independent from the rest and already in cmake.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: trinity-devel-unsubscribe(a)lists.pearsoncomputing.net
For additional commands, e-mail:
trinity-devel-help(a)lists.pearsoncomputing.net
Read list messsages on the Web archive:
http://trinity-devel.pearsoncomputing.net/
Please remember not to top-post:
http://trinity.pearsoncomputing.net/mailing_lists/#top-posting