On my notebook (OpenSuSE install) the following happens, if I place the "kicker" panel upright on the right side:
* "kicker" completely hogs 1 core (with ~4000 BogoMIPS) for around 150 seconds (yes 2:30!), just to layout and display the panel and react to interaction again * the resulting layout is very far from optimal (to be polite) * whenever I try to change any configuration option, either via 'kcontrol' or panel functions, a new "kicker" is spawned, incurring the 2:30 minutes paralysis penalty * when trying to change the panel-clock configuration (hoping) to improve layout, the system after some minutes was driven into a trashing frenzy so bad, I had to physically switch of the machine (STRG+ALT+DEL or STRG+ALT+BS or switching to a VT were not possible anymore, terminal windows not reactive, even "top" was essentially frozen!)
To better understand your vision of Trinity -- what is your perception:
On one hand the code base is from KDE3 in the era of 4:3 displays -- placing the panel sideways was at least unusual -- I never tried, and don't know if this ever worked or was expected to work ...
On the other hand, in the era of 16:9 displays IMHO side panels are a desirable option ...
So, is the reported behavior * a bug report? * a request for improvement? * a change request? * to be expected and tolerated for such an uncouth non-traditional configuration (;-) ?
Best regards,
ThoMaus
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA224
On my notebook (OpenSuSE install) the following happens, if I place the "kicker" panel upright on the right side:
- "kicker" completely hogs 1 core (with ~4000 BogoMIPS) for around 150
seconds (yes 2:30!), just to layout and display the panel and react to interaction again
- the resulting layout is very far from optimal (to be polite)
- whenever I try to change any configuration option, either via 'kcontrol'
or panel functions, a new "kicker" is spawned, incurring the 2:30 minutes paralysis penalty
- when trying to change the panel-clock configuration (hoping) to improve
layout, the system after some minutes was driven into a trashing frenzy so bad, I had to physically switch of the machine (STRG+ALT+DEL or STRG+ALT+BS or switching to a VT were not possible anymore, terminal windows not reactive, even "top" was essentially frozen!)
To better understand your vision of Trinity -- what is your perception:
On one hand the code base is from KDE3 in the era of 4:3 displays -- placing the panel sideways was at least unusual -- I never tried, and don't know if this ever worked or was expected to work ...
On the other hand, in the era of 16:9 displays IMHO side panels are a desirable option ...
So, is the reported behavior
- a bug report?
- a request for improvement?
- a change request?
- to be expected and tolerated for such an uncouth non-traditional
configuration (;-) ?
Best regards,
ThoMaus
That is most definitely a bug report, probably with a relatively high priority. It should Just Work.
Tim