11 Apr
2012
11 Apr
'12
3:13 p.m.
Hey all,
rzs pointed me to a in interesting pdf document that does a simple
benchmark of corba, dbus and dcop.
http://eleceng.dit.ie/frank/rpc/CORBAGnomeDBUSPerformanceAnalysis.pdf
According to those results dcop is 18 times faster.
Calvin
11 Apr
11 Apr
3:30 p.m.
New subject: [trinity-devel] An interesting PDF regarding DCOP and DBUS performance
On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 11:13:32 -0400
Calvin Morrison <mutantturkey(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hey all,
rzs pointed me to a in interesting pdf document that does a simple
benchmark of corba, dbus and dcop.
http://eleceng.dit.ie/frank/rpc/CORBAGnomeDBUSPerformanceAnalysis.pdf
According to those results dcop is 18 times faster.
6 times, since 18 is CORBA
compared to DBus.
Anyway this paper is *really* old (Slackware 10.2 had 2.4.31 kernel
and was released on September 2005), so D-Bus developers have had plenty
of time to make remote calls more efficient by caching, as suggested by
the paper (but I don't know if they actually did this, or even if it
is relevant to dbus itself or another layer).
Calvin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
trinity-devel-unsubscribe(a)lists.pearsoncomputing.net For additional
commands, e-mail: trinity-devel-help(a)lists.pearsoncomputing.net Read
list messages on the web archive:
http://trinity-devel.pearsoncomputing.net/ Please remember not to
top-post:
http://trinity.pearsoncomputing.net/mailing_lists/#top-posting
4657
days inactive
4657
days old
1 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
/dev/ammo42 -
Calvin Morrison