Hey all,
rzs pointed me to a in interesting pdf document that does a simple benchmark of corba, dbus and dcop.
http://eleceng.dit.ie/frank/rpc/CORBAGnomeDBUSPerformanceAnalysis.pdf
According to those results dcop is 18 times faster.
Calvin
On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 11:13:32 -0400 Calvin Morrison mutantturkey@gmail.com wrote:
Hey all,
rzs pointed me to a in interesting pdf document that does a simple benchmark of corba, dbus and dcop.
http://eleceng.dit.ie/frank/rpc/CORBAGnomeDBUSPerformanceAnalysis.pdf
According to those results dcop is 18 times faster.
6 times, since 18 is CORBA compared to DBus. Anyway this paper is *really* old (Slackware 10.2 had 2.4.31 kernel and was released on September 2005), so D-Bus developers have had plenty of time to make remote calls more efficient by caching, as suggested by the paper (but I don't know if they actually did this, or even if it is relevant to dbus itself or another layer).
Calvin
To unsubscribe, e-mail: trinity-devel-unsubscribe@lists.pearsoncomputing.net For additional commands, e-mail: trinity-devel-help@lists.pearsoncomputing.net Read list messages on the web archive: http://trinity-devel.pearsoncomputing.net/ Please remember not to top-post: http://trinity.pearsoncomputing.net/mailing_lists/#top-posting