27 Apr
2012
27 Apr
'12
5:40 p.m.
Tim,
What is the significance of checking for version 0.16 of poppler and not earlier
versions?
Darrell
5:45 p.m.
New subject: [trinity-devel] Tim: tdegraphics POPPLER_016
What is the
significance of checking for version 0.16
of poppler and not earlier versions?
IIRC there was a significant API change at that point.
OK. Does that mean the poppler tqt wrapper in tdegraphics does not build when previous
versions of poppler are found?
If yes, then what does not function as expected?
Darrell
5:59 p.m.
New subject: [trinity-devel] Tim: tdegraphics POPPLER_016
What is the significance of checking for version 0.16
of poppler and not earlier versions? IIRC there was a significant API change at that
point.
OK. Does that mean the poppler tqt wrapper in tdegraphics does not build
when previous versions of poppler are found?
If yes, then what does not function as expected?
Darrell 
10:28 p.m.
New subject: [trinity-devel] Tim: tdegraphics POPPLER_016
On 04/27/2012 07:59 PM, Timothy Pearson wrote:
No idea, other than the only problem would be a build failure, not a loss
of functionality after an apparently successful build :-) I build TDE
across a wide range of package versions on the build farm, and have not
seen a Poppler related failure in some time.
Tim
There were poppler changes at 0.16. The biggest issue is that is the last
release that supported Qt3 natively. I don't recall a 0.17, but everything with
poppler 0.18 on was built supporting Qt4 only upstream. You couldn't even
configure poppler to build Qt3 binding and longer.
I don't know the status at all for TDE. This looks like a package were we will
need to bring the last version that supported Qt3 into the GIT tree (may already
be there, I'm going from memory).
I used to maintain poppler-qt3 for Arch in AUR and it is no longer buildable
from upstream.
--
David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
What is the
significance of checking for version 0.16
of poppler and not earlier versions?
IIRC there was a significant API change at that
point.
OK. Does that mean the poppler tqt wrapper in tdegraphics does not build
when previous versions of poppler are found?
If yes, then what does not function as expected?
Darrell 
28 Apr
28 Apr
6:27 a.m.
New subject: [trinity-devel] Tim: tdegraphics POPPLER_016
On Sat, 28 Apr 2012 00:28:25 -0500
"David C. Rankin" <drankinatty(a)suddenlinkmail.com> wrote:
On 04/27/2012 07:59 PM, Timothy Pearson wrote:
No idea, other than the only problem would be a build failure, not a loss
of functionality after an apparently successful build :-) I build TDE
across a wide range of package versions on the build farm, and have not
seen a Poppler related failure in some time.
There were poppler changes at 0.16. The biggest issue is that is the last
release that supported Qt3 natively. I don't recall a 0.17, but everything with
poppler 0.18 on was built supporting Qt4 only upstream. You couldn't even
configure poppler to build Qt3 binding and longer.
I don't know the status at all for TDE. This looks like a package were we will
need to bring the last version that supported Qt3 into the GIT tree (may already
be there, I'm going from memory).
I used to maintain poppler-qt3 for Arch in AUR and it is no longer buildable
from upstream.
I poked the git server at freedesktop.org, where poppler resides, and found what
appears to be the series of commits that removed QT3 support (five on Jan. 16,
2011, plus an outlier about a month later). Full diffs for these commits are
stored, so depending on how much the codebase has changed in the past year,
we may be able to just revert them.
> What is the significance of checking for version
0.16
of poppler and not earlier versions?
IIRC there was a significant API change at that
point.
OK. Does that mean the poppler tqt wrapper in tdegraphics does not build
when previous versions of poppler are found?
If yes, then what does not function as expected?
Darrell
9:07 a.m.
New subject: [trinity-devel] Tim: tdegraphics POPPLER_016
On 04/28/2012 08:27 AM, E. Liddell wrote:
I poked the git server at freedesktop.org, where
poppler resides, and found what
appears to be the series of commits that removed QT3 support (five on Jan. 16,
2011, plus an outlier about a month later). Full diffs for these commits are
stored, so depending on how much the codebase has changed in the past year,
we may be able to just revert them.
That would be fantastic. I may still have all the older poppler sources
(somewhere). I we can just revert the changes in the current code, that would be
the best case, but if not, I have the last freedesktop sources before the
commits. I'll hunt them down if needed, but I guess you GIT masters could just
tell freedesktop to spit the code out as it existed on 1/15/2011.
For my education -- "How do you do that?" Say I wanted to clone the repository
as it existed prior to the 1/16/2011 changes, what would the git command look like?
--
David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
9:51 a.m.
New subject: [trinity-devel] Tim: tdegraphics POPPLER_016
On Sat, 28 Apr 2012 11:07:05 -0500
"David C. Rankin" <drankinatty(a)suddenlinkmail.com> wrote:
On 04/28/2012 08:27 AM, E. Liddell wrote:
IIRC:
git clone <the repository>
git checkout <the sha1 you want> .
I poked the git server at freedesktop.org, where
poppler resides,
and found what appears to be the series of commits that removed QT3
support (five on Jan. 16, 2011, plus an outlier about a month
later). Full diffs for these commits are stored, so depending on
how much the codebase has changed in the past year, we may be able
to just revert them.
That would be fantastic. I may still have all the older poppler
sources (somewhere). I we can just revert the changes in the current
code, that would be the best case, but if not, I have the last
freedesktop sources before the commits. I'll hunt them down if
needed, but I guess you GIT masters could just tell freedesktop to
spit the code out as it existed on 1/15/2011.
For my education -- "How do you do that?" Say I wanted to clone the
repository as it existed prior to the 1/16/2011 changes, what would
the git command look like?
2:34 p.m.
New subject: [trinity-devel] Tim: tdegraphics POPPLER_016
On Sat, 28 Apr 2012 18:51:13 +0200
/dev/ammo42 <mickeytintincolle(a)yahoo.fr> wrote:
We already have poppler-tqt, based on the Qt3 support for poppler, so I 'm
somewhat confused with the interest in the original Qt3 support files for
poppler.
Tim
On Sat, 28 Apr 2012 11:07:05 -0500
"David C. Rankin" <drankinatty(a)suddenlinkmail.com> wrote:
Checkout information for the repository is given at
http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Infrastructure/git/Users .
For precise reference, the first QT3-killing commit appears to be
d82f98a274bfa008c218e265a080c4af7ce95131
and I think the commit immediately prior to it was
301352e5585d4ab6e7b609b4ab79b4d8b8656092
on Jan. 9. The other QT3-killing commits were:
8dc9c693abb0033247a338d0f7d1f3f7a57c1a55
26da7a52d31eb677ab6399de2c07140aa272b35e
9a02856c2762e65b8f03e443e728e05e5a86f65b
76ab657dc81ed0af7d9f2efaca2e68d570063001
728c022cdc1ea12aa54077d44276f9d7714930d4
I haven't read over the diffs in detail, but they seem to be
pure code erasure (many files were removed wholesale,
plus some switches in the build code). We might just
be okay. On 04/28/2012 08:27 AM, E. Liddell wrote:
IIRC:
git clone <the repository>
git checkout <the sha1 you want> . I poked the git server at freedesktop.org, where
poppler resides,
and found what appears to be the series of commits that removed QT3
support (five on Jan. 16, 2011, plus an outlier about a month
later). Full diffs for these commits are stored, so depending on
how much the codebase has changed in the past year, we may be able
to just revert them.
That would be fantastic. I may still have all the older poppler
sources (somewhere). I we can just revert the changes in the current
code, that would be the best case, but if not, I have the last
freedesktop sources before the commits. I'll hunt them down if
needed, but I guess you GIT masters could just tell freedesktop to
spit the code out as it existed on 1/15/2011.
For my education -- "How do you do that?" Say I wanted to clone the
repository as it existed prior to the 1/16/2011 changes, what would
the git command look like?
2:40 p.m.
New subject: [trinity-devel] Tim: tdegraphics POPPLER_016
On Sat, 28 Apr 2012 18:51:13 +0200
/dev/ammo42 <mickeytintincolle(a)yahoo.fr> wrote:
On Sat, 28 Apr 2012 11:07:05 -0500
"David C. Rankin" <drankinatty(a)suddenlinkmail.com> wrote:
Checkout information for the repository is given at
http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Infrastructure/git/Users .
For precise reference, the first QT3-killing commit appears to be
d82f98a274bfa008c218e265a080c4af7ce95131
and I think the commit immediately prior to it was
301352e5585d4ab6e7b609b4ab79b4d8b8656092
on Jan. 9. The other QT3-killing commits were:
8dc9c693abb0033247a338d0f7d1f3f7a57c1a55
26da7a52d31eb677ab6399de2c07140aa272b35e
9a02856c2762e65b8f03e443e728e05e5a86f65b
76ab657dc81ed0af7d9f2efaca2e68d570063001
728c022cdc1ea12aa54077d44276f9d7714930d4
I haven't read over the diffs in detail, but they seem to be
pure code erasure (many files were removed wholesale,
plus some switches in the build code). We might just
be okay.
On 04/28/2012 08:27 AM, E. Liddell wrote:
IIRC:
git clone <the repository>
git checkout <the sha1 you want> . I poked the git server at freedesktop.org, where
poppler resides,
and found what appears to be the series of commits that removed QT3
support (five on Jan. 16, 2011, plus an outlier about a month
later). Full diffs for these commits are stored, so depending on
how much the codebase has changed in the past year, we may be able
to just revert them.
That would be fantastic. I may still have all the older poppler
sources (somewhere). I we can just revert the changes in the current
code, that would be the best case, but if not, I have the last
freedesktop sources before the commits. I'll hunt them down if
needed, but I guess you GIT masters could just tell freedesktop to
spit the code out as it existed on 1/15/2011.
For my education -- "How do you do that?" Say I wanted to clone the
repository as it existed prior to the 1/16/2011 changes, what would
the git command look like?
4:08 p.m.
New subject: [trinity-devel] Tim: tdegraphics POPPLER_016
On 04/28/2012 04:34 PM, Timothy Pearson wrote:
We already have poppler-tqt, based on the Qt3 support for poppler, so I 'm
somewhat confused with the interest in the original Qt3 support files for
poppler.
Tim
Tim,
Is tde/main/tdegraphics/kfile-plugins/dependencies/poppler-tqt it?
--
David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
4:14 p.m.
New subject: [trinity-devel] Tim: tdegraphics POPPLER_016
On 04/28/2012 04:34 PM, Timothy Pearson wrote:
Yes.
Tim
We already have poppler-tqt, based on the Qt3 support for poppler, so I
'm
somewhat confused with the interest in the original Qt3 support files
for
poppler.
Tim
Tim,
Is tde/main/tdegraphics/kfile-plugins/dependencies/poppler-tqt it?
--
David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
4398
days inactive
4398
days old
11 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
/dev/ammo42 -
Darrell Anderson -
David C. Rankin -
E. Liddell -
Timothy Pearson