On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:54 PM, Ilya Chernykh neptunia@mail.ru wrote:
The taskbar patch.+screenshot of how it looks (W95 style)
To unsubscribe, e-mail: trinity-devel-unsubscribe@lists.pearsoncomputing.net For additional commands, e-mail: trinity-devel-help@lists.pearsoncomputing.net Read list messsages on the Web archive: http://trinity-devel.pearsoncomputing.net/ Please remember not to top-post: http://trinity.pearsoncomputing.net/mailing_lists/#top-posting
Gawd that brings back so many bad memories -- BSODs galore, would sometimes turn it on, connect to my dialup, and get it froze mid-dial and have it hold whatever screech it was on (could hear the screeching noise from the modem while it was conecting). Win95 wasn't the worst, but pretty bad. Personally, if I didn't have Linux, I'd preffer 3.1 if i could get some decent modern software for it (and get a different filemanager AND a decent taskbar/panel type thing -- any chance of porting TDE? lol).
On Saturday 12 February 2011 06:47:50 Kristopher Gamrat wrote:
To unsubscribe, e-mail: trinity-devel-unsubscribe@lists.pearsoncomputing.net For additional commands, e-mail: trinity-devel-help@lists.pearsoncomputing.net Read list messsages on the Web archive: http://trinity-devel.pearsoncomputing.net/ Please remember not to top-post: http://trinity.pearsoncomputing.net/mailing_lists/#top-posting
Gawd that brings back so many bad memories -- BSODs galore, would sometimes turn it on, connect to my dialup, and get it froze mid-dial and have it hold whatever screech it was on (could hear the screeching noise from the modem while it was conecting). Win95 wasn't the worst, but pretty bad. Personally, if I didn't have Linux, I'd preffer 3.1 if i could get some decent modern software for it (and get a different filemanager AND a decent taskbar/panel type thing -- any chance of porting TDE? lol).
With style Phase: http://storage8.static.itmages.ru/i/11/0212/h_1297523741_f90014f7db.png
The taskbar patch.+screenshot of how it looks (W95 style)
The patch looks good. Have you tested it with any other styles (Plastik, Lipstik, Keramic, etc.) to make sure that they still work correctly?
If they do then I will gladly commit this to SVN.
Thanks!
Tim
On Sunday 13 February 2011 00:14:51 Timothy Pearson wrote:
The taskbar patch.+screenshot of how it looks (W95 style)
The patch looks good. Have you tested it with any other styles (Plastik, Lipstik, Keramic, etc.) to make sure that they still work correctly?
Yes, of course. With all of my styles it looks well.
If they do then I will gladly commit this to SVN.
On Sunday 13 February 2011 00:14:51 Timothy Pearson wrote:
The taskbar patch.+screenshot of how it looks (W95 style)
The patch looks good. Have you tested it with any other styles (Plastik, Lipstik, Keramic, etc.) to make sure that they still work correctly?
If they do then I will gladly commit this to SVN.
Screenshots in some other styles
On Sunday 13 February 2011 00:14:51 Timothy Pearson wrote:
The taskbar patch.+screenshot of how it looks (W95 style)
The patch looks good. Have you tested it with any other styles (Plastik, Lipstik, Keramic, etc.) to make sure that they still work correctly?
If they do then I will gladly commit this to SVN.
Screenshots in some other styles
All look good to me. I'll commit this in the next batch update.
Thanks again!
Tim
On Sunday 13 February 2011 08:03:09 Timothy Pearson wrote:
The taskbar patch.+screenshot of how it looks (W95 style)
The patch looks good. Have you tested it with any other styles (Plastik, Lipstik, Keramic, etc.) to make sure that they still work correctly?
If they do then I will gladly commit this to SVN.
Screenshots in some other styles
All look good to me. I'll commit this in the next batch update.
Thanks again!
Thank you. Maybe also make the classical mode the default? In "optimal mode" the button is still not pushed on mouse click, and the "transparent" mode is too plain...
This will also make the new outlook visible to those who are unaware of the change.