Do any Trinity users use scrollkeeper? Trinity maintains legacy KDE3 code to support scrollkeeper, but scrollkeeper hasn't been supported in a decade. The successor is something called rarian, which Trinity does not support and seems to be a GNOME app.
Do we want to continue scrollkeeper support?
Further, do we want to support metasearch engines at all? We maintain kerry, which is a beagle front-end. Beagle has not been supported in a number of years.
So nobody uses scrollkeeper or beagle?
Should I delete the sources and see who screams?
Darrell
On 01/19/2014 02:24 AM, Darrell Anderson wrote:
So nobody uses scrollkeeper or beagle?
Should I delete the sources and see who screams?
Darrell
Never heard of scrollkeeper and beagle is the second incarnation of hell in a resource wasting ill conceived [index your harddrive] pipe-dream.
I don't think anyone will scream...
Do any Trinity users use scrollkeeper? Trinity maintains legacy KDE3 code to support scrollkeeper, but scrollkeeper hasn't been supported in a decade. The successor is something called rarian, which Trinity does not support and seems to be a GNOME app.
Do we want to continue scrollkeeper support?
Further, do we want to support metasearch engines at all? We maintain kerry, which is a beagle front-end. Beagle has not been supported in a number of years.
So nobody uses scrollkeeper or beagle?
Should I delete the sources and see who screams?
Darrell
I had wanted to replace the Beagle bindings with Tracker bindings, but never found time to do it.
Tim
-
Darrell Anderson -
David C. Rankin -
Timothy Pearson