Tim,
If I set -DWITH_ALL_OPTIONS=ON, am I able to override individual options to OFF?
For example, in tdebase if I set the following:
-DWITH_PAM=OFF -DWITH_ALL_OPTIONS=ON
would PAM support get built or not?
Darrell
Tim,
If I set -DWITH_ALL_OPTIONS=ON, am I able to override individual options to OFF?
AFAIK yes.
For example, in tdebase if I set the following:
-DWITH_PAM=OFF -DWITH_ALL_OPTIONS=ON
would PAM support get built or not?
No, it would not be built.
Tim
If I set -DWITH_ALL_OPTIONS=ON, am I able to override
individual options
to OFF?
AFAIK yes.
For example, in tdebase if I set the following:
-DWITH_PAM=OFF -DWITH_ALL_OPTIONS=ON
would PAM support get built or not?
No, it would not be built.
Thanks. Yeah, I would find out eventually, but nice to know ahead of time. Building packages takes a lot of time.... :)
Darrell
On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 10:43:40 -0800 (PST) Darrell Anderson humanreadable@yahoo.com wrote:
If I set -DWITH_ALL_OPTIONS=ON, am I able to override
individual options
to OFF?
AFAIK yes.
For example, in tdebase if I set the following:
-DWITH_PAM=OFF -DWITH_ALL_OPTIONS=ON
would PAM support get built or not?
No, it would not be built.
Thanks. Yeah, I would find out eventually, but nice to know ahead of time. Building packages takes a lot of time.... :)
I don't think CMake would take so much time to figure out that Slackware has no PAM ;)
Darrell
To unsubscribe, e-mail: trinity-devel-unsubscribe@lists.pearsoncomputing.net For additional commands, e-mail: trinity-devel-help@lists.pearsoncomputing.net Read list messsages on the Web archive: http://trinity-devel.pearsoncomputing.net/ Please remember not to top-post: http://trinity.pearsoncomputing.net/mailing_lists/#top-posting
-
/dev/ammo42 -
Darrell Anderson -
Timothy Pearson