14 Jan
2012
14 Jan
'12
6:10 p.m.
Tim,
If I set -DWITH_ALL_OPTIONS=ON, am I able to override individual options to OFF?
For example, in tdebase if I set the following:
-DWITH_PAM=OFF
-DWITH_ALL_OPTIONS=ON
would PAM support get built or not?
Darrell
14 Jan
14 Jan
6:25 p.m.
New subject: [trinity-devel] -DWITH_ALL_OPTIONS
Tim,
If I set -DWITH_ALL_OPTIONS=ON, am I able to override individual options
to OFF?
AFAIK yes.
For example, in tdebase if I set the following:
-DWITH_PAM=OFF
-DWITH_ALL_OPTIONS=ON
would PAM support get built or not?
No, it would not be built.
Tim
6:43 p.m.
New subject: [trinity-devel] -DWITH_ALL_OPTIONS
If I set
-DWITH_ALL_OPTIONS=ON, am I able to override
individual options
to OFF?
AFAIK yes.
For example, in tdebase if I set the following:
-DWITH_PAM=OFF
-DWITH_ALL_OPTIONS=ON
would PAM support get built or not?
No, it would not be built. 
7:17 p.m.
New subject: [trinity-devel] -DWITH_ALL_OPTIONS
On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 10:43:40 -0800 (PST)
Darrell Anderson <humanreadable(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
Thanks. Yeah, I would find out eventually, but nice to know ahead of
time. Building packages takes a lot of time.... :) I don't think CMake would
take so much time to figure out that
Slackware has no PAM ;)
If I set -DWITH_ALL_OPTIONS=ON, am I able to override
individual options
to OFF?
AFAIK yes.
For example, in tdebase if I set the following:
-DWITH_PAM=OFF
-DWITH_ALL_OPTIONS=ON
would PAM support get built or not?
No, it would not be built.
Darrell
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
trinity-devel-unsubscribe(a)lists.pearsoncomputing.net For additional
commands, e-mail: trinity-devel-help(a)lists.pearsoncomputing.net Read
list messsages on the Web archive:
http://trinity-devel.pearsoncomputing.net/ Please remember not to
top-post:
http://trinity.pearsoncomputing.net/mailing_lists/#top-posting
4758
days inactive
4758
days old
3 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
/dev/ammo42 -
Darrell Anderson -
Timothy Pearson