5 Dec
2013
5 Dec
'13
3:25 a.m.
as further thing to consider, have 3.5.10 and R14 been
compiled in
the same configuration (either release-release or debug-debug)? On
some intensive programs I noticed a speed difference ratio or 3-to-
1 between the two.
3-to-1 ratio --- which one was faster?
Speaking of debugging, does including the debugging symbols affect
run-time operation? I would not think so but on old hardware might
that be true? I wonder because now in hindsight I remember I never
built or installed the debugging symbols for the 3.5.10 or TDE
3.5.x packages. (I'm still not letting newer versions of X and the
kernel off the hook. Just wondering out loud.)
Darrell
5 Dec
5 Dec
4:03 a.m.
New subject: [trinity-devel] Trinity on older hardware
3-to-1 ratio --- which one was faster?
Speaking of debugging, does including the debugging
symbols affect
run-time operation?
Sorry, perhaps it wasn't that clear. The release version is quicker.
The difference is in the optimization options used when compiling in release mode instead
of debug mode.
4:17 a.m.
New subject: [trinity-devel] Trinity on older hardware
as further
thing to consider, have 3.5.10 and R14 been compiled in
the same configuration (either release-release or debug-debug)? On
some intensive programs I noticed a speed difference ratio or 3-to-
1 between the two.
3-to-1 ratio --- which one was faster?
Speaking of debugging, does including the debugging symbols affect
run-time operation?
4036
days inactive
4036
days old
2 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Darrell Anderson -
Michele Calgaro -
Timothy Pearson