Darrell,
The kthesaurus package contains broken links to the associated wordnet package from Princeton. The correct link is:
http://wordnet.princeton.edu/wordnet/download/
The actual wordnet file is:
http://wordnetcode.princeton.edu/3.0/WordNet-3.0.tar.bz2
We should also include a link to the page explaining proper citing of the wordnet database:
http://wordnet.princeton.edu/wordnet/citing-wordnet/
as well as links to the extension packages for wordnet:
http://wordnet.princeton.edu/wordnet/citing-wordnet/
Opened as:
What am I supposed to do?
We probably should grep the entire source tree for links, run a ping test, and note whether the test fails. The ping test would only prove whether the URL remains in existence but would not reveal whether the URL remains valid within context.
Darrell
On 02/15/2014 01:40 PM, Darrell Anderson wrote:
What am I supposed to do?
We probably should grep the entire source tree for links, run a ping test, and note whether the test fails. The ping test would only prove whether the URL remains in existence but would not reveal whether the URL remains valid within context.
Darrell
Nothing,
I'm grepping koffice where I think it lives. When I find it I'll patch it (if I can) or tell you that you and Slavek will need to take a look.
On 02/15/2014 01:53 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
On 02/15/2014 01:40 PM, Darrell Anderson wrote:
What am I supposed to do?
We probably should grep the entire source tree for links, run a ping test, and note whether the test fails. The ping test would only prove whether the URL remains in existence but would not reveal whether the URL remains valid within context.
Darrell
Nothing,
I'm grepping koffice where I think it lives. When I find it I'll patch it (if I can) or tell you that you and Slavek will need to take a look.
Patch Available:
http://bugs.pearsoncomputing.net/attachment.cgi?id=1931&action=diff
On 02/15/2014 02:58 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
On 02/15/2014 01:53 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
On 02/15/2014 01:40 PM, Darrell Anderson wrote:
What am I supposed to do?
We probably should grep the entire source tree for links, run a ping test, and note whether the test fails. The ping test would only prove whether the URL remains in existence but would not reveal whether the URL remains valid within context.
Darrell
Nothing,
I'm grepping koffice where I think it lives. When I find it I'll patch it (if I can) or tell you that you and Slavek will need to take a look.
Patch Available:
http://bugs.pearsoncomputing.net/attachment.cgi?id=1931&action=diff
For those building koffice in the near future, please test the following patch:
cd koffice patch -Np0 -i koffice-thesaurus-wordnet.diff
If it works, let's go ahead and push it. It does not effect anything in koffice other than the error messages in kthesaurus that corrects the URL for the WordNet sources.
Once confirmed and pushed close 1931.
-
Darrell Anderson -
David C. Rankin