16 Apr
2013
16 Apr
'13
5:18 p.m.
I have one small suggestion. Script r14-xdg-update
writes to the
configuration key Updated. If the script could contain internal
version
number (or timestamp), it could to key Updated write this value
and then
this value use to decide whether to execute again or not.
Such solution could cover any subsequent updates. And it would not
depend on testing the specific renamed files. What do you think?
Sounds like a good idea.
I never envisioned needing the script long-term, but I'm horrible
at predicting the future. Hopefully by the time R15 is the main
trunk in GIT we no longer need the script. Until then, perhaps we
should embrace your suggestion. :)
Currently we use the following:
[R14 XDG Updates]
Updated=true
Perhaps change that to:
[R14 XDG Updates]
R14.0.0-Updated=true
If we do that then what mechanism do we use in the script itself to
track this? I'm thinking of corner cases such as a user updates
from 3.5.13.1 to R14.0.2 or something like that. Corner cases
always ruin parties. :)
Darrell
16 Apr
16 Apr
5:31 p.m.
New subject: [trinity-devel] konqueror no file names on nightly
Dne út 16. dubna 2013 Darrell Anderson napsal(a):
I was thinking a little bit different way - for example:
[R14 XDG Updates]
Updated=R14.0.0
or (maybe better - can cover also changes during development versions and
also easier for comparison in shell)
[R14 XDG Updates]
Updated=20130407
Where timestamp is not date of the conversion for user, but the internal
date of r14-xdg-update script, which make conversion.
Slavek
--
I have one
small suggestion. Script r14-xdg-update writes to the
configuration key Updated. If the script could contain internal
version
number (or timestamp), it could to key Updated write this value
and then
this value use to decide whether to execute again or not.
Such solution could cover any subsequent updates. And it would not
depend on testing the specific renamed files. What do you think?
Sounds like a good idea.
I never envisioned needing the script long-term, but I'm horrible
at predicting the future. Hopefully by the time R15 is the main
trunk in GIT we no longer need the script. Until then, perhaps we
should embrace your suggestion. :)
Currently we use the following:
[R14 XDG Updates]
Updated=true
Perhaps change that to:
[R14 XDG Updates]
R14.0.0-Updated=true
If we do that then what mechanism do we use in the script itself to
track this? I'm thinking of corner cases such as a user updates
from 3.5.13.1 to R14.0.2 or something like that. Corner cases
always ruin parties. :)
Darrell
4313
days inactive
4313
days old
1 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Darrell Anderson -
Slávek Banko