Hi all,
on the bug 2127 happened that because of the lack of information about its existence, on the same problem we are actively working three developers simultaneously. It is a luxury that we can not afford!
It could be that the information about the new bugs automatically receive all active developers? I mean, Tim, Slávek, Michele, François and Darrell.
What do you think?
On Wed October 1 2014 12:13:21 pm Slávek Banko wrote:
Hi all,
on the bug 2127 happened that because of the lack of information about its existence, on the same problem we are actively working three developers simultaneously. It is a luxury that we can not afford!
It could be that the information about the new bugs automatically receive all active developers? I mean, Tim, Slávek, Michele, François and Darrell.
What do you think?
I thought you were preparing the patches. At least that was what I intended with my last comment in the bug report.
Darrell
On Wednesday 01 of October 2014 21:20:51 Darrell wrote:
On Wed October 1 2014 12:13:21 pm Slávek Banko wrote:
Hi all,
on the bug 2127 happened that because of the lack of information about its existence, on the same problem we are actively working three developers simultaneously. It is a luxury that we can not afford!
It could be that the information about the new bugs automatically receive all active developers? I mean, Tim, Slávek, Michele, François and Darrell.
What do you think?
I thought you were preparing the patches. At least that was what I intended with my last comment in the bug report.
Darrell
Yes, exactly - you're to know about this bug report, so we synchronize our work. I learned about this bug report only after I have pushed a patch to Amarok and I had developed another patches => as had already developed François. And finally pushed some patches Michele, who also developed in substantially the same patches, regardless of this bug report.
That's why I want to avoid such situations, when the three of us are doing identical work. I think that if we knew about this bug report, it would not happen. And so it seems to me useful to automatically come to all of us the informations about all newly created bug reports.
What is your opinion?
Yes, exactly - you're to know about this bug report, so we synchronize our work. I learned about this bug report only after I have pushed a patch to Amarok and I had developed another patches => as had already developed François. And finally pushed some patches Michele, who also developed in substantially the same patches, regardless of this bug report.
That's why I want to avoid such situations, when the three of us are doing identical work. I think that if we knew about this bug report, it would not happen. And so it seems to me useful to automatically come to all of us the informations about all newly created bug reports.
What is your opinion?
I understand the desire, but I don't want to be notified of every bug report filed or changed.
The problem described has not occurred often. The root problem is sometimes some of us are forgetful and do not check the bugzilla before acting. :(
Bug report 2127 currently is assigned to Francois. I am content to wait until you and he resolve the bug report. :)
Darrell
It could be that the information about the new bugs automatically receive all active developers? I mean, Tim, Slávek, Michele, François and Darrell.
What do you think?
I usually check for new bugs every time and I had actually seen that bug report (2127) a few days ago, but had forgotten by the time I was addressing FTBFS during a full rebuild.
I don't think it is strictly necessary, but it's ok for me if we implement such notification system. Only users who wants to be notified should be added to the list of receipients. If we do implement that, include me in the list as well.
Cheers Michele
-
Darrell -
Michele Calgaro -
Slávek Banko