I notice in my xsession-error log a mixture of [tdeinit] and
[kinit
wrapper] identifiers. To remain consistent, should we change
[kinit
wrapper] to [tdeinit wrapper]?
Yes, unifying name sounds like a good idea.
I searched the entire source tree. To help improve consistency I don't see why tdelibs/kinit and kinit.cpp can't be renamed to tdeinit. Only a few changes required and they only affect compiling. The tde-i18n module has a lot of po files that would need updating, but all of that is just text.
Similarly, I searched the sources and don't see why kdessh and kdelirc, both from tdeutils, can't be renamed to tdessh and tdelirc.
I can create some patches and test unless there are serious objections.
Lastly, there are many README files in the sources, most containing incorrect references to "KDE" or "KDE3." We probably should update those files with proper rebranding references. Not the text used in historical contexts, just the text used in real-time references.
Darrell
I notice in my xsession-error log a mixture of [tdeinit] and
[kinit
wrapper] identifiers. To remain consistent, should we change
[kinit
wrapper] to [tdeinit wrapper]?
Yes, unifying name sounds like a good idea.
I searched the entire source tree. To help improve consistency I don't see why tdelibs/kinit and kinit.cpp can't be renamed to tdeinit. Only a few changes required and they only affect compiling. The tde-i18n module has a lot of po files that would need updating, but all of that is just text.
Similarly, I searched the sources and don't see why kdessh and kdelirc, both from tdeutils, can't be renamed to tdessh and tdelirc.
I can create some patches and test unless there are serious objections.
Lastly, there are many README files in the sources, most containing incorrect references to "KDE" or "KDE3." We probably should update those files with proper rebranding references. Not the text used in historical contexts, just the text used in real-time references.
Darrell
Looks sane to me. Go ahead and apply this change when you have time. :-)
Tim