18 Sep
2012
18 Sep
'12
7:50 p.m.
François, David, all,
After incorporation of patches to change the path to the documentation, the
current state of the GIT branches v3.5.13-sru seems to be ready to release
3.5.13.1. Please, are there any other patches that should be included? Errors
that should be resolved? Anything else for what should be a release
postponed?
For example:
Should I incorporate the latest patches from Darrell for KPDF?
+ http://trinity-devel.pearsoncomputing.net/?0::10089
+ http://trinity-devel.pearsoncomputing.net/?0::10090
It should first resolve bugs reported by François? As:
+ http://bugs.pearsoncomputing.net/show_bug.cgi?id=1151
+ http://bugs.pearsoncomputing.net/show_bug.cgi?id=1159
Furthermore, I would like to ask: François, David, can you test build using
GIT branch v3.5.13-sru or you need first tarballs? Note: With updated scripts
and branch v3.5.13-sru on meta-project 'tde' is now easy switching GIT to
branch v3.5.13-sru.
I look forward to hearing your opinions and comments.
Slávek
--
19 Sep
19 Sep
5:02 a.m.
New subject: [trinity-devel] 3.5.13.1 finishing
Le 18/09/2012 21:50, Slávek Banko a écrit :
François, David, all,
After incorporation of patches to change the path to the documentation, the
current state of the GIT branches v3.5.13-sru seems to be ready to release
3.5.13.1. Please, are there any other patches that should be included? Errors
that should be resolved? Anything else for what should be a release
postponed?
Good news! On my side, I have no patch to include to 3.5.13.1 at the
moment.
For example:
Should I incorporate the latest patches from Darrell for KPDF?
+ http://trinity-devel.pearsoncomputing.net/?0::10089
+ http://trinity-devel.pearsoncomputing.net/?0::10090
I think these patches are too
young to be included in 3.5.13.1 .
It should first resolve bugs reported by François?
As:
+ http://bugs.pearsoncomputing.net/show_bug.cgi?id=1151
+ http://bugs.pearsoncomputing.net/show_bug.cgi?id=1159
These ones are build issue,
I can live without them, other people did
not even mention them.
Furthermore, I would like to ask: François, David, can you test build using
GIT branch v3.5.13-sru or you need first tarballs? Note: With updated scripts
and branch v3.5.13-sru on meta-project 'tde' is now easy switching GIT to
branch v3.5.13-sru.
I'd prefer to have final tarballs to test in real
conditions.
I look forward to hearing your opinions and comments.
Slávek
Thanks
Francois
23 Sep
23 Sep
2:51 p.m.
New subject: [trinity-devel] 3.5.13.1 finishing
On Wednesday 19 of September 2012 07:02:42 Francois Andriot wrote:
moment.
using
François, you can find tarballs on:
http://ppa.quickbuild.pearsoncomputing.net/trinity/releases/3.5.13.1/
Are named with "~rc1" to have the possibility to add some latest patches
before the final release. Currently, one patch, which will be included
surely => setting the version number. A further two new patches that I
would like included. Please, can you also test this patches?
All of these patches are attached to the report:
http://bugs.pearsoncomputing.net/show_bug.cgi?id=1130
Thanks,
Slávek
--
Le 18/09/2012 21:50, Slávek Banko a écrit :
> François, David, all,
>
> After incorporation of patches to change the path to the
documentation, the
> current state of the GIT branches v3.5.13-sru
seems to be ready to
release
> 3.5.13.1. Please, are there any other patches
that should be included?
Errors
that should be
resolved? Anything else for what should be a release
postponed?
Good news! On my side, I have no patch to include to 3.5.13.1 at the
For example:
Should I incorporate the latest patches from Darrell for KPDF?
+ http://trinity-devel.pearsoncomputing.net/?0::10089
+ http://trinity-devel.pearsoncomputing.net/?0::10090
I think these patches are
too young to be included in 3.5.13.1 .
It should first resolve bugs reported by
François? As:
+ http://bugs.pearsoncomputing.net/show_bug.cgi?id=1151
+ http://bugs.pearsoncomputing.net/show_bug.cgi?id=1159
These ones are build
issue, I can live without them, other people did
not even mention them.
>
> Furthermore, I would like to ask: François, David, can you test build > GIT branch v3.5.13-sru or you need first
tarballs? Note: With updated
scripts
> and branch v3.5.13-sru on meta-project
'tde' is now easy switching GIT
to
branch
v3.5.13-sru.
I'd prefer to have final tarballs to test in real conditions.
I look forward to hearing your opinions and comments.
Slávek
Thanks
Francois
5:31 p.m.
New subject: [trinity-devel] 3.5.13.1 finishing
A little nit-pickin'.
It's time for konqueror's Help => About konqueror to identify as 3.5.13.1
versus "konqueror 3.5.10" -- is it not? See attached image -- if
images are permitted in a posting...
jonesy@nix4:~$ dpkg -l | grep konqueror
ii konqueror-nsplugins-trinity 4:3.5.13-1ubuntu0+ax2~lucid Netscape plugin ...
ii konqueror-trinity 4:3.5.13-1ubuntu0+ax2~lucid KDE's advanced ...
And, should not that be "Trinity's advanced file manager, web browser ...."
above?
Thanks to all the hard working, dedicate team members of the Trinity
project for supporting the Most Comfortable desktop environment I've
ever used!
Jonesy
11:14 p.m.
New subject: [trinity-devel] 3.5.13.1 finishing
On Sunday 23 of September 2012 19:31:35 Jonesy wrote:
A little nit-pickin'.
It's time for konqueror's Help => About konqueror to identify as 3.5.13.1
versus "konqueror 3.5.10" -- is it not? See attached image -- if
images are permitted in a posting...
jonesy@nix4:~$ dpkg -l | grep konqueror
ii konqueror-nsplugins-trinity 4:3.5.13-1ubuntu0+ax2~lucid Netscape
plugin ... ii konqueror-trinity 4:3.5.13-1ubuntu0+ax2~lucid
KDE's advanced ...
And, should not that be "Trinity's advanced file manager, web browser
...."
above?
Thanks to all the hard working, dedicate team members of the Trinity
project for supporting the Most Comfortable desktop environment I've
ever used!
Jonesy
It has a simple reason. Although the version number 3.5.13.1 is common for TDE
release, applications still have their individual version numbers. For
example - KMail has version 1.9.10, Kopete 0.12.7,...
For packages is used common version number TDE release. For this reason, the
version number of package may be different from individual version number of
the program.
Slavek
--
24 Sep
24 Sep
1:23 p.m.
New subject: [trinity-devel] 3.5.13.1 finishing
Le 23/09/2012 16:51, Slávek Banko a écrit :
François, you can find tarballs on:
http://ppa.quickbuild.pearsoncomputing.net/trinity/releases/3.5.13.1/
Are named with "~rc1" to have the possibility to add some latest patches
before the final release. Currently, one patch, which will be included
surely => setting the version number. A further two new patches that I
would like included. Please, can you also test this patches?
All of these patches are attached to the report:
http://bugs.pearsoncomputing.net/show_bug.cgi?id=1130
Thanks,
Slávek
Hello, thanks for the tarballs :-)
I've built and tested TDE 3.5.13.1~rc1 up to kdebase package, including
bug #1130 patches, and it seems to work fine.
If you are ready to release final packages, you do not need to wait for
me to build the entire RC1.
I think that all what I'll have to submit will be distro-specific
patches, useless for other people. It could wait for next release anyway.
Francois
19 Sep
19 Sep
8:14 a.m.
New subject: [trinity-devel] 3.5.13.1 finishing
On 18/09/12 20:50, Slávek Banko wrote:
François, David, all,
After incorporation of patches to change the path to the documentation, the
current state of the GIT branches v3.5.13-sru seems to be ready to release
3.5.13.1. Please, are there any other patches that should be included? Errors
that should be resolved? Anything else for what should be a release
postponed?
Release it now or in the near future and then start working on 3.5.13.2
the next SRU version,
Andrew
12:07 p.m.
New subject: [trinity-devel] 3.5.13.1 finishing
On 19 September 2012 04:14, Andrew Young <mail(a)andrewyoung.co.uk> wrote:
On 18/09/12 20:50, Slávek Banko wrote:
+1
3.5.13-SRU was huge! so many patches. I would prefer many smaller
releases, with maybe 10 or less patches each, in higher frequency,
from our stable branch (of course it is all up to you slavek, just
offering my input)
François, David, all,
After incorporation of patches to change the path to the documentation,
the
current state of the GIT branches v3.5.13-sru seems to be ready to release
3.5.13.1. Please, are there any other patches that should be included?
Errors
that should be resolved? Anything else for what should be a release
postponed?
Release it now or in the near future and then start working on 3.5.13.2 the
next SRU version,
Andrew
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: trinity-devel-unsubscribe(a)lists.pearsoncomputing.net
For additional commands, e-mail:
trinity-devel-help(a)lists.pearsoncomputing.net
Read list messages on the web archive:
http://trinity-devel.pearsoncomputing.net/
Please remember not to top-post:
http://trinity.pearsoncomputing.net/mailing_lists/#top-posting
6:55 p.m.
New subject: [trinity-devel] 3.5.13.1 finishing
> Release it now or in the near future and then
start working on 3.5.13.2 the
> next SRU version,
Agreed.
Don't try to get 3.5.13.1 perfect. What exists now for 3.5.13.1 far exceeds the
quality of 3.5.13. Push the 3.5.13.1 tarballs.
Additional 3.5.13.x releases make some sense, but I'd rather see time and energy
focused on getting R14 out the door. The time and energy devoted to 3.5.13.1 has robbed
R14 of forward progress.
Maintaining a stable 3.5.13.x is challenging because of the need to evaluate and test
backwards compatibility of every single patch --- 'TQ/tq' transpositional fixes,
XDG differences, etc. Those differences won't exist with R14 point releases. The
sooner we get R14 out the door the better off we'll be.
3.5.13-SRU was huge! so many patches. I would prefer
many
smaller releases, with maybe 10 or less patches each, in higher
frequency, from our stable branch (of course it is all up to you
slavek, just offering my input)
I have been proposing this type of release schedule for a long while.
Darrell
22 Sep
22 Sep
1:45 p.m.
New subject: [trinity-devel] 3.5.13.1 finishing
Slávek Banko wrote:
François, David, all,
After incorporation of patches to change the path to the documentation, the
current state of the GIT branches v3.5.13-sru seems to be ready to release
3.5.13.1. Please, are there any other patches that should be included? Errors
that should be resolved? Anything else for what should be a release
postponed?
What about packaging? Did you still manage to check whether libogg0 can
be removed from Trinity on Ubuntu? I'd really like to see this solved
for the Precise version.
Thanks,
Julius
3:28 p.m.
New subject: [trinity-devel] 3.5.13.1 finishing
On Saturday 22 of September 2012 15:45:02 Julius Schwartzenberg wrote:
Slávek Banko wrote:
As you could see in another thread this problem are also discussed, but so far
no easy solution.
http://trinity-users.pearsoncomputing.net/?0::3580
http://trinity-users.pearsoncomputing.net/?0::3581
Slavek
--
François, David, all,
After incorporation of patches to change the path to the documentation,
the current state of the GIT branches v3.5.13-sru seems to be ready to
release 3.5.13.1. Please, are there any other patches that should be
included? Errors that should be resolved? Anything else for what should
be a release postponed?
What about packaging? Did you still manage to check whether libogg0 can
be removed from Trinity on Ubuntu? I'd really like to see this solved
for the Precise version.
Thanks,
Julius
5:11 p.m.
New subject: [trinity-devel] 3.5.13.1 finishing
Slávek Banko wrote:
On Saturday 22 of September 2012 15:45:02 Julius
Schwartzenberg wrote:
Are you sure the library is still needed? What happens when you just
remove it from the repository?
I understood from Tim that the special Trinity version was needed in the
past to compile some packages but it probably wasn't needed anymore.
Julius
What about packaging? Did you still manage to
check whether libogg0 can
be removed from Trinity on Ubuntu? I'd really like to see this solved
for the Precise version.
As you could see in another thread this problem are also discussed, but so far
no easy solution.
http://trinity-users.pearsoncomputing.net/?0::3580
http://trinity-users.pearsoncomputing.net/?0::3581
5:30 p.m.
New subject: [trinity-devel] 3.5.13.1 finishing
On Saturday 22 of September 2012 19:11:12 Julius Schwartzenberg wrote:
Are you sure the library is still needed? What happens
when you just
remove it from the repository?
I understood from Tim that the special Trinity version was needed in the
past to compile some packages but it probably wasn't needed anymore.
I'm pretty sure that packages in 3.5.13.x have dependency on libogg-dev-la.
When I delete libogg from repository, builds will be not possible. Tim tested
in R14, if it is possible to change this dependency to libogg-dev. I do not
know the outcome yet.
Slávek
--
25 Sep
25 Sep
3:51 p.m.
New subject: [trinity-devel] 3.5.13.1 finishing
Dne so 22. září 2012 Julius Schwartzenberg napsal(a):
Are you sure the library is still needed? What happens
when you just
remove it from the repository?
I understood from Tim that the special Trinity version was needed in
the past to compile some packages but it probably wasn't needed
anymore.
Julius
Well, I rebuild all packages that have been dependent on libogg-dev-la. So
now this dependency is no longer needed. Package libogg is already
removed from my PPA.
Slávek
--
3:57 p.m.
New subject: [trinity-devel] 3.5.13.1 finishing
Dne so 22. záÅà 2012 Julius Schwartzenberg
napsal(a):
The remainder of the R14 rebuild test has been running since last night;
once it completes without any ogg errors I will remove the hacked ogg
package from the main archive as well.
Tim
Are you sure the library is still needed? What
happens when you just
remove it from the repository?
I understood from Tim that the special Trinity version was needed in
the past to compile some packages but it probably wasn't needed
anymore.
Julius
Well, I rebuild all packages that have been dependent on libogg-dev-la. So
now this dependency is no longer needed. Package libogg is already
removed from my PPA.
Slávek
22 Sep
22 Sep
5:16 p.m.
New subject: [trinity-devel] 3.5.13.1 finishing
Hi all,
I do not know if anyone already preparing to announce the release of a new
version, but I have prepared a wiki page with a detailed list of changes. The
announcement could include a link to this page.
http://www.trinitydesktop.org/wiki/bin/view/Documentation/Releases_3_5_13_1…
Slavek
--
7:33 p.m.
New subject: [trinity-devel] 3.5.13.1 finishing
I do not know if anyone already preparing to announce
the
release of a new version, but I have prepared a wiki page with a detailed
list of changes. The announcement could include a link to this page.
http://www.trinitydesktop.org/wiki/bin/view/Documentation/Releases_3_5_13_1…
Slavek,
Do you know whether these two bugs affect 3.5.13 or 3.5.13.1:
http://bugs.pearsoncomputing.net/show_bug.cgi?id=1111
http://bugs.pearsoncomputing.net/show_bug.cgi?id=178
The bug only affects 32-bit systems.
To test in k3b, select "Burn DVD ISO Image." The dialog will show "No image
file selected." There are no problems with CD images.
With kio-iso, in konqueror "right-click" on a DVD ISO image and from the popup
menu, select Open With ISO9660 Image Viewer or select Actions ISO9660 View.
These errors do not occur in a 64-bit system, which implies both apps are not being built
correctly to read large files.
Darrell
25 Sep
25 Sep
3:44 p.m.
New subject: [trinity-devel] 3.5.13.1 finishing
Dne so 22. září 2012 Darrell Anderson napsal(a):
Please patch for k3b (in GIT) is well tested and approved?
Is patch suitable for inclusion into 3.5.13.1?
Slavek
--
I do not know
if anyone already preparing to announce the
release of a new version, but I have prepared a wiki page with a
detailed list of changes. The announcement could include a link to
this page.
http://www.trinitydesktop.org/wiki/bin/view/Documentation/Releases_3_
5_13_1_Changelog
Slavek,
Do you know whether these two bugs affect 3.5.13 or 3.5.13.1:
http://bugs.pearsoncomputing.net/show_bug.cgi?id=1111
http://bugs.pearsoncomputing.net/show_bug.cgi?id=178
The bug only affects 32-bit systems.
To test in k3b, select "Burn DVD ISO Image." The dialog will show "No
image file selected." There are no problems with CD images.
With kio-iso, in konqueror "right-click" on a DVD ISO image and from
the popup menu, select Open With ISO9660 Image Viewer or select Actions
ISO9660 View.
These errors do not occur in a 64-bit system, which implies both apps
are not being built correctly to read large files.
Darrell
4471
days inactive
4478
days old
17 comments
9 participants
participants (9)
-
Andrew Young -
Calvin Morrison -
Darrell Anderson -
Francois Andriot -
François Andriot
-
Jonesy -
Julius Schwartzenberg -
Slávek Banko -
Timothy Pearson