31 May
2015
31 May
'15
1:19 a.m.
Hi all,
in the test build on Debian Stretch I noticed a CMake warning CMP0054.
Warnings were in common CMake module - change therefore causes rebuild for
almost everything. Please test the attached patch.
See: http://www.cmake.org/cmake/help/v3.1/policy/CMP0054.html
--
Slávek
31 May
31 May
6:48 a.m.
New subject: [trinity-devel] CMake 3.1 and CMP0054
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
On 2015/05/31 10:19 AM, Slávek Banko wrote:
Hi all,
in the test build on Debian Stretch I noticed a CMake warning
CMP0054. Warnings were in common CMake module - change therefore
causes rebuild for almost everything. Please test the attached
patch.
See: http://www.cmake.org/cmake/help/v3.1/policy/CMP0054.html
Hi Slavek,
I also noticed that. I will try the patch sometime this week and let
you know.
Cheers
Michele
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2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=3H/7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
10:38 a.m.
New subject: [trinity-devel] CMake 3.1 and CMP0054
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
On 05/31/2015 03:48 PM, Michele Calgaro wrote:
On 2015/05/31 10:19 AM, Slávek Banko wrote:
Slavek,
I tried building tdeutils with the cmake patch and all the warning messages about CMP0054
are gone.
The patch looks good.
Cheers
Michele
Hi all,
in the test build on Debian Stretch I noticed a
CMake warning CMP0054. Warnings were in common CMake module -
change therefore causes rebuild for almost everything. Please test the attached patch.
Hi Slavek, I also noticed that. I will try the patch sometime this week and let you know.
Cheers Michele
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2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=2z+L
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
11:49 a.m.
New subject: [trinity-devel] CMake 3.1 and CMP0054
On Sunday 31 of May 2015 12:38:54 Michele Calgaro wrote:
On 05/31/2015 03:48 PM, Michele Calgaro wrote:
Well. I tried tdelibs and tdebase - both okay. I did not observe any
regression. It seems that I can push the patch.
--
Slávek
On 2015/05/31 10:19 AM, Slávek Banko wrote:
Slavek,
I tried building tdeutils with the cmake patch and all the warning messages
about CMP0054 are gone. The patch looks good.
Cheers
Michele
Hi all,
in the test build on Debian Stretch I noticed a CMake warning CMP0054.
Warnings were in common CMake module - change therefore causes rebuild
for almost everything. Please test the attached patch.
See: http://www.cmake.org/cmake/help/v3.1/policy/CMP0054.html
Hi Slavek, I also noticed that. I will try the patch sometime this week
and let you know. Cheers Michele
1:18 p.m.
New subject: [trinity-devel] CMake 3.1 and CMP0054
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
On 05/31/2015 08:49 PM, Slávek Banko wrote:
Well. I tried tdelibs and tdebase - both okay. I did
not observe any regression. It seems that I can push the
patch.
Yes, go ahead
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2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=2oBt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
3493
days inactive
3493
days old
4 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Michele Calgaro -
Slávek Banko