All,
I'm considering an update to my office desktop computer I built 5 years ago. A new system with SATA III, USB 3.0, quad core, an SSD, etc, would seriously help with Trinity build times.
I would like to keep the system as quiet as possible with no increase in the electric bill over my current dual core AMD system (about 65-80 watts).
I'm grateful for suggestions and advice or sharing what you are using.
Thanks :-)
Darrell
Hi,
I've been sick for the last 2 days, yesterday I spent most of the day in bed and was almost too dumb to start the computer. Today I feel better but not up to writing scripts or testing ports and crap. What little testing I did try showed me that I still have problems with closed ports.
Re motherboards. I am an Asus/AMD fanboy. The only "BAD" MB that I got from them in the last 10 years was this model:Asus M4A77TD -- DO NOT BUY IT!
I bought three of those BAD un's, right after a lightning strike cost me two motherboards. The extra one was so I didn't have to wait 2-3 weeks for a replacement. One died in a year, the second one died the next year, the last one is still running. All of them had major "quirks". I think they were caused by driver problems--network, sound and boot systems.
Anyway, that bad experience pissed me off and I decided to spend whatever it took to get a really dependable "modern" MB. I decided that this MB at $190 was what I wanted. I bought the AMD version because it handled 8 core CPUs which were a lot cheaper than Intel's.
http://www.amazon.com/ASUS-SABERTOOTH-990FX-R2-0-Motherboard/dp /B008YDJHWM/ref=sr_1_17?s=pc&ie=UTF8&qid=1387239639&sr =1-17&keywords=motherboard+sabertooth
It failed the "pour 16 oz of iced tea on the motherboard CPU while it is running" test but otherwise I have had no problems in the two years that I have owned one.
Motherboards in the last few years have gone the same way as hard drives and most other equipment. You have to research all the user reviews and pick one that has the most good (4 or 5) ratings and whose problems that give them a poor rating are not a big deal to you. If the #1 rating (lowest) is 20% or higher I won't buy it unless I have no choice.
Since when you do get a long lasting MB, the main reason you wind up upgrading it is because you want some new technology (USB3, Sata6, PCI-e, etc) My only advice is to get one that has more of the "new" technology than what you need right now--thataway when you do want to upgrade you don't have to change the MB. Also I prefer 4 ram slots instead of 2, so that when I get some extra ram I can use it in that machine..
One PCI (old style) slot is still a good idea. If you are going to hammer it (building Trinity, video editing or conversion) then an aftermarket fan is a good idea. I sorta went overboard on the CPU fan cooler. <grin> You can turn the fans off on the CPU cooler and it still stays within the CPU'sworking temperature range.
Power consumption of the motherboard itself is not much of an issue. Most of the power they use is to run the RAM, CPU and "drives" that you install. The Sabertooth I bought has a 8 core CPU and can push over 185 watts to it when needed. But when they are not being used the power cost is about what a dual core would draw under the same load.
I have one of those KILLAWATT power meters and on my system using: 16 gig ram, 8 core CPU, 4 active hard drives, (6) 120mm fans, one SSD drive and a 650 watt power supply, the meter shows about a 250-270 watt power consumption while surfing.
BTW power supplies are very important. Get one with a much higher power than you need. When the extra power is not being used the power drain is no bigger than a smaller supply. But there are "large and sudden drains (CPU going to all cores, memory maxing out suddenly, Video card maxing out, etc) When these happen, if you do not have a good PS, the system gets voltage and or current drops and spikes that can confuse or crash the system. For the above system I got a 650 watt, even though a 450 "should" have been able to handle it.
Not much help probably, but something to think about.
Keith
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Darrell Anderson darrella@hushmail.comwrote:
All,
I'm considering an update to my office desktop computer I built 5 years ago. A new system with SATA III, USB 3.0, quad core, an SSD, etc, would seriously help with Trinity build times.
I would like to keep the system as quiet as possible with no increase in the electric bill over my current dual core AMD system (about 65-80 watts).
I'm grateful for suggestions and advice or sharing what you are using.
Thanks :-)
Darrell
To unsubscribe, e-mail: trinity-devel-unsubscribe@lists.pearsoncomputing.net For additional commands, e-mail: trinity-devel-help@lists.pearsoncomputing.net Read list messages on the web archive: http://trinity-devel.pearsoncomputing.net/ Please remember not to top-post: http://trinity.pearsoncomputing.net/mailing_lists/#top-posting
On 16/12/2013 22:23, Darrell Anderson wrote:
All,
I'm considering an update to my office desktop computer I built 5 years ago. A new system with SATA III, USB 3.0, quad core, an SSD, etc, would seriously help with Trinity build times.
I would like to keep the system as quiet as possible with no increase in the electric bill over my current dual core AMD system (about 65-80 watts).
Hi Darrell,
I've had great pain lately with two new systems I built. Obviously, newer MBs are UEFI based which introduces complexities, especially if multibooting and booting from legacy devices can be problematic. Installing linux (debian in my case) also proved problematic with these UEFI boards and graphics cards. Windows seems to install fine, maybe as that is the OS everything is taylored to.
The two MBs in question are both AMD based (I will not use AMD in the future) as are the CPUs (obviously), both FX series, an AMD FX-8350 & AMD FX-6300. The boards are Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD5 and an ASUS M5A99X Evo R2.
The bigget issue besides UEFI bios is RAM. It's critical these days to ensure support prior to purchase, especially with AMD systems. AMD memory conroller is in the CPU so tools like memtest86 aren't as much use as they used to be. Both my systems (every combination of MB/CPU) fail memtest86 with more than one core enabled. Be careful with RAM qty and speed with AMD CPU/MB. 32GB RAM is not supported at certain higher speeds of RAM, a fact not well advertised by AMD.
If you go AMD route, the first thing to install therefore is the latest chipset/raid drivers from the AMD site (rather than the MB cdrom). The next big issue is the PSU. Unfortunately, with these newer systems, bigger is better.
If possible, buy RAM/CPU/MB from same place (not easy I know) as resolving compatibilities when bought seperately is a nightmare.
Best solution of all (if Windows is not wanted), buy yourself a number of ARM devices and farm them :).
I will be going Intel in future, more expensive but I'm not willing to face the trouble I've had with this AMD kit ever again.
Cheers,
On 16/12/2013 22:23, Darrell Anderson wrote:
All,
I'm considering an update to my office desktop computer I built 5 years ago. A new system with SATA III, USB 3.0, quad core, an SSD, etc, would seriously help with Trinity build times.
I would like to keep the system as quiet as possible with no increase in the electric bill over my current dual core AMD system (about 65-80 watts).
Hi Darrell,
I've had great pain lately with two new systems I built. Obviously, newer MBs are UEFI based which introduces complexities, especially if multibooting and booting from legacy devices can be problematic. Installing linux (debian in my case) also proved problematic with these UEFI boards and graphics cards. Windows seems to install fine, maybe as that is the OS everything is taylored to.
The two MBs in question are both AMD based (I will not use AMD in the future) as are the CPUs (obviously), both FX series, an AMD FX-8350 & AMD FX-6300. The boards are Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD5 and an ASUS M5A99X Evo R2.
The bigget issue besides UEFI bios is RAM. It's critical these days to ensure support prior to purchase, especially with AMD systems. AMD memory conroller is in the CPU so tools like memtest86 aren't as much use as they used to be. Both my systems (every combination of MB/CPU) fail memtest86 with more than one core enabled. Be careful with RAM qty and speed with AMD CPU/MB. 32GB RAM is not supported at certain higher speeds of RAM, a fact not well advertised by AMD.
If you go AMD route, the first thing to install therefore is the latest chipset/raid drivers from the AMD site (rather than the MB cdrom). The next big issue is the PSU. Unfortunately, with these newer systems, bigger is better.
If possible, buy RAM/CPU/MB from same place (not easy I know) as resolving compatibilities when bought seperately is a nightmare.
Best solution of all (if Windows is not wanted), buy yourself a number of ARM devices and farm them :).
I will be going Intel in future, more expensive but I'm not willing to face the trouble I've had with this AMD kit ever again.
Cheers,
-- Mike Howard
Intel has problems too. This is probably not the best time to be building a new computer as there are a lot of new (read: immature and buggy) technologies in play.
If you want something to work out-of-the-box with minimum fuss, go for Intel workstation/server boards. They are more expensive, but work 100% with Linux. Also, with the latest push for energy efficient servers, you can get a fairly good performance/watt ratio.
All this from a former AMD champion as well. ;-)
Tim