tde-devels May 2018

devels@trinitydesktop.org

18 participants
25 discussions

by wofgdkncxojef＠gmail.com

Yes, this is a coup.... Well, i don't think i'm saying anything controversial, when i'm saying that pearson has no time for trinity, and the project is effectively leaderless. From the perspective of an outsider (me), Slavek seams the most invested in the project.... Maybe he should be in charge.

6 years, 1 month

Renaming and split in to official and extra

by wofgdkncxojef＠gmail.com

Ok, everyone listen. I'm proposing to split the programs, in official trinity and extra. The list of official packages should be restricted. They should be of good enough quality and as a whole should be close to the functionality of DE like MATE and xfce. The devs should decide upon the list, and then make sure they maintain their quality. They should be renamed, with proper names, not kdename-trinity, and pulled out of opt. In extra will be everything else. The idea is, for the official part to be more appealing to distros. If trinity get's in to distros, it will have more exposure and get more devs. an initial proposal of what the official packages could be: all the base system and libs of course kdesktop, kicker, tdenetwork manager, tdm, kmix, klipper, control center, dolphin, kwrite, kmail, kwallet, kaffeine, konsole, amarok, kalculator, gwenview, ark, kpdf other?. konqueror is not good enough for a default file manager because of it's outdated web browsing component. all the above should get proper names, not kdename-trinity and moved out of opt. Even the libs, should be renamed something like trinity libs, not tqt. The stuff in extra can stay in opt as it is. And don't forget, the quality of what will be in the list must stay good enough, you can't just shove everything. Once the list will be desided, then it will need to be decided how to rename them. The whole point of this, is to have something nice, the distros can accept taking in. They should not see "Konqueror-trinity" that can't render facebook or youtube. The whole point of getting accepted by distros, is so that the project gets more exposure and hence more devs.

6 years, 2 months

proposal, move to github

by wofgdkncxojef＠gmail.com

I'm proposing to move to github. Not for technical reasons. Github is the facebook of open source. Been there, should attract more devs.... Moving the code will be simple enough. The bugs however will not be straight forward....

6 years, 2 months

proposal for a new strategy

by wofgdkncxojef＠gmail.com

I hope i'll get more responces then usual. -_- If no one responds, a kitten will die. I think trinity doesn't has much of a strategy. Here some ideas ---------------------------------------------- trinity would be split in to two parts 1.trinity proper This will be a relatively restricted set of important components of high quality. This will be a bit like other normal DE, like xfce and mate. For example, it will have the libs, kdesktop, kicker, tdm, konsole, amarok, kaffeine, dolphin, klipper etc... See restricted, important and high quality. 2. trinity extra apps Here goes everything else trinity proper will be given priority in fixing bugs. Also, all of trinity proper would be properly renamed and moved out of opt. for example tqt becomes trinity libs, konsole becomes trinity terminal or something like that. See proper names, not kdename-trinity. Then, an attempt would be made, to push trinity proper to debian. And from there it would move up ubuntu. Trinity will get more exposure, more users and more bug fixes, including for trinity extra apps. For the extra apps, users would use an extra repo like now. The names can stay "kdename-trinity" or be fully renamed. And the quality maters less. At some unspecified time in the future, apps from here will be moved to trinity proper. -------------------------------- an other idea would be, to move the code to github Not for technical reasons. Many developers are already there. This will increase the probability that the project will get more exposure and devs.

6 years, 2 months

unable to build tdelibs on gentoo box

by dmummenschanz＠web.de

6 years, 2 months

Re: unable to build tdelibs on gentoo box

by dmummenschanz＠web.de

6 years, 2 months

Re: unable to build tdelibs on gentoo box

by dmummenschanz＠web.de

6 years, 2 months

alex couture pclinuxos tde remaster

by wofgdkncxojef＠gmail.com

alex couture has made a pclinuxos remaster with tde. He's asking to be uploaded on trinity servers. https://bugs.pearsoncomputing.net/show_bug.cgi?id=2864 Maybe this should be decided upon, before 14.0.5 comes out....

6 years, 2 months

kmix mixer_backend.cpp

by deloptes

Hi, I looked yesterday in kmix code and I see this, which I think is a bit wrong, or I do not understand why close() is called even if open fails - we just want to know if mixer is valid. bool Mixer_Backend::isValid() { bool valid = false; int ret = open(); if ( ret == 0 && m_mixDevices.count() > 0) { valid = true; } close(); return valid; } regards

6 years, 2 months

[ Re-send ] Explaining the process of adding bugs to next TDE release

by Michele Calgaro

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Dear all, re-sending without autocrypt option. There has been some reports of problems with SPAM filters discarding the previous email. If you already received the first message yesterday, please ignore this one and accept our apologies for the double sending. If you didn't get the original email, please read below. Cheers Michele, Slavek - -------------------- Dear all, we would like to explain the process of how bug reports get added to the next release bug list. As many of you probably know, there are some bug reports (that we call meta bugs) that serve as an index for bugs to fix or already fixed for the next maintenance and minor release. For example bug 2247 for R14.1.0, bug 2696 for R14.0.5 and bug 2885 for R14.0.6. These meta bugs are intended to list bugs that have been selected by the developers for the mentioned coming release, so we would like to invite all of you to refrain from directly adding bugs to those lists on your own. Instead you should first discuss with one of the developers (say Tim, Slavek or Michele) and if agreed, you can then add the bug to the discussed list. The reason for this logic (and limitation) is that if anyone just add bugs indiscriminately based on their own needs, those lists would grow out of control and out of what is physically possible to achieve with the development workforce that TDE has at the moment. We encourage all of you to participate in making TDE better, but please take note of the above procedure and try sticking to it as much as possible. On a side note, R14.0.5 bug list has been frozen and no other bugs will go into it unless critical of blockers. Of course, if a working patch is provided before the release of R14.0.5, we will consider that for inclusion. Feel free to provide your feedback on the process explain above Cheers Michele, Slavek -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEjhl1z5vbYB3YbFTiKnW3yore1c8FAlsD2uwACgkQKnW3yore 1c9tjw/9GTvzkZULvstj5VBBWjdJgfbkFQ+hDq8c7cRleKDqDwwK89uSdWshe6G7 VU5fwH82CScdF4itYr8GxZvwmZPcLtPvy83WLsEPL4pvC8oNoUZtHkqNniL8CP14 wfiUZcFuQvMa251i2KP0a1QBREd8xJhbj09obfz8YFa9sRQq0cauMgMDqxVOR+6U 0MU8CgTNplh49XWAjX9e5upwsgvqEb58e53h0XsYOn9aM+tvUOnCaKA83eIlICUe R6qt5807sKPbd2fXlpSNmtprPllwo/OKse/KUrCq0a3hifG64xapwub/S+ylGFpf Q2RfHxvKVUnSOyElNe7wYYjVhBv5qCcGO4mE7uR8TwsN3ta2vL226aw5rNv8Oarb nNKrjBO5Ey3F4wxhFI5ZNOmQqU6eqSvqwiT2lN2nVZ0CCuXGDScXcHo8gLM3j6la 9hSE/R8KouLtef2NyrFB1ObWtn2p4geAbQKVTyr9sQyS2K07Fyub2qeamdJeOyEV 1HtCzK+ot3QwD+jrTfQEigJGUitW4DPfy6iVLHBJz+B5kkOspYJq8Ks9EQh/Zya0 BNRKpqettm6RlOchuNHa7NWuPOyQUyyPnBI371+EsBAohZdgm0Nuis9RYVnoXII0 YO9F31g8dfY9rCTJ9CkFV4GpA6879uswTcxEf/AEod/m4ZdhnR8= =lSLn -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

6 years, 2 months

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

tde-devels May 2018