tde-devels

devels@trinitydesktop.org

3753 discussions

Bookmarks in kdialog and konqueror fail to function

by Darrell Anderson

I'm using the latest GIT sources from the past couple of days. This is a full package set rebuilt. I'm seeing may related error messages in the xsession log: KAction::property( "icon" ) failed: property invalid or does not exist KAction::setProperty( "icon", value ) failed: property invalid, read-only or does not exist KAction::property( "name" ) failed: property invalid or does not exist KAction::setProperty( "name", value ) failed: property invalid, read-only or does not exist KToolBarPopupAction::property( "shortcut" ) failed: property invalid or does not exist KToolBarPopupAction::setProperty( "shortcut", value ) failed: property invalid, read-only or does not exist KToolBarPopupAction::property( "name" ) failed: property invalid or does not exist KToolBarPopupAction::setProperty( "name", value ) failed: property invalid, read-only or does not exist KToggleFullScreenAction::property( "shortcut" ) failed: property invalid or does not exist KToggleFullScreenAction::setProperty( "shortcut", value ) failed: property invalid, read-only or does not exist KToggleFullScreenAction::property( "name" ) failed: property invalid or does not exist KToggleFullScreenAction::setProperty( "name", value ) failed: property invalid, read-only or does not exist KonqMainWindow::property( "currentProfile" ) failed: property invalid or does not exist KonqSidebarBrowserExtension::property( "urlDropHandling" ) failed: property invalid or does not exist ListViewBrowserExtension::property( "urlDropHandling" ) failed: property invalid or does not exist KBookmarkAction::setProperty( "url", value ) failed: property invalid, read-only or does not exist KBookmarkAction::setProperty( "address", value ) failed: property invalid, read-only or does not exist My previous full package set from Oct. 17 did not have this problem. So only a few patches qualify as the cause. Darrell

12 years, 3 months

Which files in the user guides to be installed?

by Slávek Banko

Darrell, all, In the patch for tdenetworks (attachment 926 / 927 in bug 1262) I solved that with cmake are not installed some files into the 'doc' that were installed with autotools: + knewsticker: TODO + kppp: costsgraphs.fig, kppp.faq.question, ttyS-cua.txt + krdc: authentication.eps, krdc_window.eps, preferences_profilestab.eps, preferences_rdpdefaultstab.eps, preferences_vncdefaultstab.eps, snapshot.eps, snapshot_connectionspeed.eps, snapshot_nobrowse.eps, snapshot_vncentry.eps + krfb: configuration_access.eps, configuration_network.eps, configuration_session.eps, connection.eps, email_invitation.eps, invitation_management.eps, personal_invitation.eps, screenshot.eps For some files, I am not sure if this is considered a "source" and omission when installing is right - desirable? For example 'fig' and 'eps' files. Please, I need someone smarter to give me advice. Slavek --

12 years, 3 months

Proposal change description for version numbers

by Slávek Banko

Hi all, in preparing the road map, I noticed that in tdelibs/tdecore/tdeversion.h are the instructions for the version numbers different from the way we intended. My proposal to change the description as follows: AS IS: ====== /* R <ABI VERSION> . <BUGFIX REVISION> . <SECURITY PATCHLEVEL> Security patchlevel is not present on initial release It is added on the first security release, starting with ".a" ".a" would correspond to a TDE_VERSION_RELEASE of 1, ".b" would be 2, etc. A new bugfix revision resets the security level A new ABI version resets both the bugfix revision and the security level */ CHANGE TO: ========== /* R <ABI VERSION> . <FEATURE REVISION> . <BUG AND SECURITY PATCH LEVEL> Initial release is always R<ABI VERSION>.0.0. BUG AND SECURITY PATCH LEVEL is always updated with a point release. FEATURE REVISION is updated when new features are introduced or existing features are significantly updated. A FEATURE REVISION release does NOT include ABI changes. A new FEATURE REVISION level always resets the BUG AND SECURITY PATCH LEVEL. A new ABI version resets both the FEATURE REVISION level and BUG AND SECURITY PATCH LEVEL. */ What is your opinion? Slavek --

12 years, 3 months

Draft: R14.0.0 Road Map

by Slávek Banko

Hi all, some time ago I was in the users mailing-list announced that I wanted to write a proposal to work on new Trinity versions with GIT branches. To few initial paragraphs were added the some next sections. And result is the draft for plan to release R14.0.0 - road map. Because the proposal is longer, I placed it on the Etherpad: http://trinity.etherpad.trinitydesktop.org/39 As you all know, my English is not good - English is not my native language. So at this point I would like to thank Darrell for help with the correction of this proposal. Your ideas and comments are welcomed. Slavek --

12 years, 3 months

kmail: The server certificate failed the authenticity test

by Darrell Anderson

I receive the following message when I send an email with one of my email addresses: The server certificate failed the authenticity test The certificate is good to 2016, but something else must trigger this dialog. I don't know how the code logic inspects certificates to send those dialogs. Perhaps I have something configured incorrectly. A second dialog prompts: Would you like to accept this certificate forever without being prompted? I select Forever but the next time I send an email I see the same dialogs, which implies kmail is not saving that option correctly. Can anybody confirm this behavior? I don't see anything obvious in the bug tracker. Darrell

12 years, 3 months

Source tarballs names

by Fat-Zer

It's a year and one release since rebranding rename of git packages and all everything... But tarball packages placed on the ofitial page are still named with kde- prefix. The page I ment: http://trinity.blackmag.net/releases/3.5.13.1/downloads.html.

12 years, 3 months

Trinity Repository problems

by Keith Daniels

Following the instructions for "For Precise [Ubuntu 12.04] LTS (v3.5.13.1)" from: http://www.trinitydesktop.org/wiki/bin/view/Documentation/UbuntuBinaryInsta…. I got these "Failed to fetch" messages with "apt-get update": ----------- From: http://ppa.quickbuild.pearsoncomputing.net/trinity/trinity-v3.5.13/ubuntu/d… source/Sources binary-amd64/Packages binary-i386/Packages Error: 404 Not Found From: http://ppa.quickbuild.pearsoncomputing.net/trinity/trinity-builddeps-v3.5.1… /source/Sources /binary-amd64/Packages /binary-i386/Packages Error: 404 Not Found ---------- I assume this is why I got so many "unmet dependencies" when I tried "apt-get install" Is there something wrong with the repository or is it something on my end...? ALSO: I am trying to install Trinity on Lubuntu 12.04. Lubuntu was a fresh install on a blank drive and has not been modified since the install. Will using Lubuntu instead of Ubuntu, be a problem? Keith

12 years, 3 months

GIT builds for other distros

by Darrell Anderson

We provide no way for regular users to help us test the development branch. Do we have a mechanism in place to upload daily/nightly/weekly builds from GIT? If not then what needs to be done to provide that access? What about the GIT repo itself? For example, I notice the following directory: http://git.trinitydesktop.org/cgit/tde-packaging/tree/slackware Although intended for hosting build scripts and packaging information, why not a single set of binary packages too? The packages would not be mirrored. Darrell

12 years, 3 months

Re: [trinity-devel] A few duplicate locolor icons

by Slávek Banko

Dne Monday 22 of October 2012 21:41:45 jste napsal(a): > On Monday 22 of October 2012 21:36:31 Francois Andriot wrote: > > >> I show the following in my package sets: > > >> > > >> kbabel.png: > > >> tdeartwork, tdesdk > > >> > > >> ktimemon.png: > > >> tdeartwork, tdeaddons > > >> > > >> Darrell > > > > > > Yes, we have the same files - Debian binary packages are more > > > granulary. I will update the installation, to be installed in only one > > > of these packages. The question is, from which package? > > > > > > a) All from tdearwork > > > b) From tdeaddons and tdesdk > > > c) None of the above => another interesting idea :) > > > > > > Slavek > > > > I think the locolor icons should go with the package that provides the > > "index" for the locolor theme. > > Without the index installed, the icons are useless. > > I believe the package providing locolor index is tdeartwork. > > > > Francois > > François, absolutely perfect note! > The decision was made :) > > Thank you. > > Slavek It's a little complicated. Icons are installed in the standard way (automake as well as cmake) == automatically installs all variants of the icon that are available. It appears that there are three possible solutions: 1) Remove locolor icon. 2) Rename icon or move to a subfolder. 3) Skip icon during packaging in individual distributions. Any other ideas? Which solution seems preferable? Slavek --

12 years, 3 months

RPM packages for 3.5.13.1

by Darrell Anderson

Some favorable comments here about Trinity: http://lxer.com/module/forums/t/33920/ Folks are looking for 3.5.13.1 RPM packages but the Trinity web site has no links. I recall reading Francois had made RPM packages for several distros. Where are the links on the web page? Darrell

12 years, 3 months

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

tde-devels