15 Oct
2012
15 Oct
'12
10:17 p.m.
On 2012年10月16日 02:39, Darrell Anderson wrote:
In practical terms, Trinity is a continuation of KDE
3.5.10
I'm sorry, but I have to say you(Trinity) are not. KDE promises binary
compatibility and you(Trinity) breaks it. Is that called continuation ?
Pretending and disclaiming you are a continuation of KDE3 would
eventually only bring more bad names to you(Trinity) and probably KDE.
Face and acknowledge the truth: You are a fork, and everybody already knows.
Seriously, is that so hard and shameful?
Regards
Jekyll