I didn't scale it, no. That's a bigger issue though, as you can see from
Crystal SVG some cards have different versions for smaller icons, to
improve the icon's clarity. Sometimes it's warranted, sometimes it's not.
Based on your reaction, I suspect that what I presented actually looks
too finished. That's my fault, though--really, I know better.
I mean that I thought these were final designs?
Best regards,
Tiago
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 2:43 PM, E. Liddell <ejlddll(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 01:46:48 +0000
Tiago Marques <tiagomnm(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 10:18 PM, E. Liddell
<ejlddll(a)googlemail.com>
wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Dec 2011 02:20:28 +0100
> L0ner sh4dou <sh4dou(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > 2011/12/15 E. Liddell <ejlddll(a)googlemail.com>
>
> > >If there's no great hurry, I may try my hand at sketching something
> > >over the next few days . . .
> > Your sketches will be more than welcome. And there is no hurry, since
> > I need to gather my ideas for whole structure of website, not only
for
> > layout.
>
> Okay, it took a little longer than I had hoped. So sue me. Here are
nine
These seem a bit to complex to pass as a logo. As been discussed recently
about the icon set, it would be important to keep Crystal SVG and has
such
have a logo that blends well together style and
color wise with the
existing theme. Perhaps toning down on the reflections would also help
with
visual recognition of the logo. I think it is
important that whatever
comes
out of this thread is easily used from 16x16 up
to 256x256 pixels, though
that is not always possible.
I am forced to ask--did you actually try scaling them? The tree, triangle,
and
triskele designs, which received the most votes, remain recognizable at
16x16
(little details like the tree's leaves and the triskele's loops are
inevitably lost,
but the overall shapes remain clear). Details like colour and reflection
are
easy to change--it's the basic shape that's important in a logo.
Based on your reaction, I suspect that what I presented actually looks
too finished. That's my fault, though--really, I know better.
I also rather liked sh4dou's 1st sketch.
I think this is the heart of the matter. Eventually, someone's going to
have
to tally the votes and hand them over to Timothy for a decision, but I
don't think there's any hurry.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
trinity-devel-unsubscribe(a)lists.pearsoncomputing.net
For additional commands, e-mail:
trinity-devel-help(a)lists.pearsoncomputing.net
Read list messsages on the Web archive:
http://trinity-devel.pearsoncomputing.net/
Please remember not to top-post:
http://trinity.pearsoncomputing.net/mailing_lists/#top-posting