Re: [trinity-devel] Arch - kdebase packaging - install versus cp + chmod?

Baho - and others interested in packaging specifics, In the kdebase PKGBUILD, I handled packaging of kdmrc and the Xsession file as follows: # set kdm directory _kdmdir=${trinity_prefix}/share/config/kdm [[ -d ${pkgdir}/${_kdmdir} ]] || install -d -m755 ${pkgdir}/${_kdmdir} # install kdmrc [[ -f kdmrc ]] && install -m644 kdmrc ${pkgdir}/${_kdmdir} # update the Xsession file [[ -f Xsession ]] && install -m755 Xsession ${pkgdir}/${_kdmdir} # create the starttrinity link [[ -d ${pkgdir}/usr/bin ]] || mkdir -p ${pkgdir}/usr/bin cd ${pkgdir}/usr/bin ln -sf /opt/trinity/bin/startkde starttrinity You handled it slightly differently, primarily using cp and chmod instead of install and adding the 'n' option to the link of starttrinity: _kdmdir=${_prefix}/share/config/kdm [[ -d ${pkgdir}/${_kdmdir} ]] || install -d -m755 ${pkgdir}/${_kdmdir} [[ -f kdmrc ]] && cp -v kdmrc ${pkgdir}/${_kdmdir} [[ -f ${scrdir}/Xsession ]] && { cp -v ${scrdir}/Xsession ${pkgdir}/${_kdmdir} chmod 0755 ${pkgdir}/${_kdmdir}/Xsession } [[ -d ${pkgdir}/usr/bin ]] || mkdir -p ${pkgdir}/usr/bin ln -snf startkde ${pkgdir}/usr/bin/starttrinity What is the benefit of using cp + chmod instead of 'install -m'? Also, why the 'ln -snf' on starttrinity instead of just 'ln -sf'? Just habit or convention? On both, I'm just curious. If the cp + chmod is less problematic, then that's the way I want to go, but I don't want to just dismiss the use of install without understanding the benefit. What says the master?