3 Mar
2016
3 Mar
'16
12:15 p.m.
On 03/01/2016 07:32 AM, E. Liddell wrote:
On Sat, 27 Feb 2016 22:25:13 +0700
Michele Calgaro <michele.calgaro(a)yahoo.it> wrote:
Hi E.
Thanks for posting some logo prototypes, the one with the tree is quite nice.
I think though we should move away from the "gear" concept if we are going to
change our logo.
Just my 2 cents, but I appreciate the effort you put in on this (as usual :-) )
Cheers
Michele
On 02/27/2016 06:27 AM, deloptes wrote:
For your amusement, then, here are some very early stage concept sketches. (I included
a couple of random ones like the "tree-nity" logo from the batch I did ~4 years
ago and
the spiral-T just to give some variety to the set.) I didn't bother with
colour/gradient/fancy
outline tricks at this point because I'm not inclined to put that much work into
something
we end up not moving forward with.
Basic design criteria included incorporating some idea of "three-ness" (or
"T-ness" in
a couple of cases), and not looking too much like anyone else's logo that I know of.
Which is why the one that looks most like Trisquel Linux's has that triangle added.
Logos too similar = potential trademark infringement.
E. Liddell
Michele Calgaro wrote:
this looks great
I would have suggested the tetragrammaton as the base of whole universe, but
we would go into deep religious and philosophic dispute if it is 3 or 4
etc. ;-), however it would fit the Trinity part
It seems the new logo idea is gathering some consensus.
Thomas (or E.), would you be able to come up with some concept logos from the suggested
page/symbol
and post that to the list for consideration? Once we have a few options, we can further
discuss with
Tim who is the benevolent project coordinator ;-)