Re: [trinity-devel] A users perspective on Trinity

While we are on that topic I should mention that I consider many of the original "suggestions" in the message I forwarded to be nits, if not just plain ridiculous.  I forwarded the message to this list to make sure that I was not alone, and to see what people's thoughts on the matter were. To clear up some things: * koffice cannot be built in pieces, but there is no reason to drop it at this time.  It will stay in the TDE distribution tarball for the forseeable future, and *may* even pick up some enhancements along the way if ioslaves from Calligra can be backported to TQt easily enough. * The extent of the renaming for the 3.5.13 release would be core libraries and non-user-visible strings.  This would be done only to make downstream packaging easier (i.e. rename libkdecore.so to libtdecore.so, etc.).  User visible strings / application names will probably never change, except the KDE->TDE string replacement that has already occurred. Tim --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: trinity-devel-unsubscribe(a)lists.pearsoncomputing.net For additional commands, e-mail: trinity-devel-help(a)lists.pearsoncomputing.net Read list messsages on the Web archive: http://trinity-devel.pearsoncomputing.net/ Please remember not to top-post: http://trinity.pearsoncomputing.net/mailing_lists/#top-posting