3 Nov
2011
3 Nov
'11
9:09 a.m.
In article
<1320256534.11880.YahooMailClassic(a)web161404.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>om>,
Darrell Anderson <trinity-devel(a)lists.pearsoncomputing.net> wrote:
I would not be opposed to a single SRU for the 3.5.13 kdebase module, as
that is where most of the regressions seem to be centered. I have started
an Etherpad to keep track of proposed changes in the SRU here:
http://trinity.etherpad.trinitydesktop.org/16
If you don't have an Etherpad account just request one.
Tim
The Trinity Paper Cut project never got officially
launched after
3.5.12. I would like to see that project receive official attention.
Many bugs were quashed for 3.5.13, but I can't test any bug reports I
filed until I build and install packages. I have received only a few
notices that any of the bug reports I filed received attention.
Though I only dabble on the development side I'd like to support this
view. 3.5.13 is a superb piece of work with many improvements, and I
am running it on my main stable machine which says something about my
trust for it. Congratulations to everyone involved !
But a few regressions have crept into 3.5.13, particularly my Javascript
one which is turning out to prevent quite a number of AJAX based sites
from working, and one or two others that also seem to be related to cmake
not picking up libraries (haven't bugged them yet as I have been busy
this week). I think these may disappoint people who come to Trinity as
the JS one at least is quite visible.
I'm certainly willing to help on a 3.5.13.1 "papercut" release and feed
the fixes forwards to the main branch, to leave the main devs free to
tackle features in 3.5.14.
Nick
--