16 Dec
2011
16 Dec
'11
12:47 a.m.
2011/12/16 L0ner sh4dou <sh4dou(a)gmail.com>om>:
2011/12/16 Calvin Morrison
<mutantturkey(a)gmail.com>om>:
As for css
magic, I did my tumblr page myself
(http://bitdata.tumblr.com/), which is pretty simple and old css
(apart for the fonts).
On 15 December 2011 19:29, L0ner sh4dou <sh4dou(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Well I can do some css magic. It will look good and render on modern
browsers (forget about konqueror tho).
Not using databases is a big problem, since it practically constrains
you to use static pages. As I said we could use the wiki system for
everything. I'll try to make a draft after I finish pkgbuilds.
2011/12/16 Calvin Morrison <mutantturkey(a)gmail.com>om>:
Indeed it looks great and works well, though I think it is very complicated
(it is hosted in their git repository so you can see)
I'd like to see some things.
A "planet" - basically it's a feed for all of our different blogs into one
page.
A "apps" section, I think Darrell spoke about this before.
In fact, Darrell had a lot of good stuff and ideas for simplifying the
navigation of the website, they're somewhere in the mail logs recently.
I think we are avoiding using any sort of databsases however and we want to
make sure tihs all will render well on any web browser.
Calvin Morrison
On 15 December 2011 18:01, L0ner sh4dou <sh4dou(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> 2011/12/15 Calvin Morrison <mutantturkey(a)gmail.com>om>:
> >
> >
> > On 15 December 2011 07:14, L0ner sh4dou <sh4dou(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> 2011/12/15 Nicolas Bercher <nbercher(a)yahoo.fr>fr>:
> >> > L0ner sh4dou a écrit :
> >> >
> >> >> You got me thinking about whole triselon thing. I did a two litte
> >> >> sketches for trinity logo proposal.
> >> >> First: http://db.tt/LwqZWTuP
> >> >> Second: http://db.tt/YpivoAGk
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Maybe the "T" is not that much important and the logo could
be
> >> > designed
> >> > without it.
> >> >
> >> > Nicolas
> >> >
> >> If we remove the t from the second one we will just get logo of
> >> Trisquel linux. For the first one it's integral part of logo,
> >> without
> >> it the space looks 'empty' to me.
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> >> trinity-devel-unsubscribe(a)lists.pearsoncomputing.net
> >> For additional commands, e-mail:
> >> trinity-devel-help(a)lists.pearsoncomputing.net
> >> Read list messsages on the Web archive:
> >> http://trinity-devel.pearsoncomputing.net/
> >> Please remember not to top-post:
> >> http://trinity.pearsoncomputing.net/mailing_lists/#top-posting
> >>
> >
> > I like the first one more than the second (reminds me of the
> > trisequal
> > logo
> > to much, could be taken as far as a blatant rip off :x)
> Same opinion here.
>
> >
> > Does no one like the current trinity logo? I sort of like it actually
> > :)
> > But
> > if I had to pick it would be the first one.
> >
> > I like the idea of the Gear. it reminds me of a hard working, well
> > tuned
> > machine designed for serious activities, rather than a less serious
> > one.
> Yes, but this gear is too strong reference to KDE, anyway we can have
> a gear-like tooths in the logo (like in second example).
> >
> > Could you create this as an SVG? I could give it a whack.
> >
> Only If I learn how to xD
> Anyway I'm more occupied by PKGBUILDs for arch ATM, so I will work on
> this after I finish those. This was to gather some ideas, since I want
> to create new webpage for trinity at some point (acutally second thing
> on my TO-DO list, after PKGBUILDs)
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> trinity-devel-unsubscribe(a)lists.pearsoncomputing.net
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> trinity-devel-help(a)lists.pearsoncomputing.net
> Read list messsages on the Web archive:
> http://trinity-devel.pearsoncomputing.net/
> Please remember not to top-post:
> http://trinity.pearsoncomputing.net/mailing_lists/#top-posting
>
Aside from archlinux packages I'm also the defacto website designer,
well
sort of.
I developed the current website ( a vast improvement from the previous
one )
and it's been quite careful.
We don't want anything to much, or to little, to complicated or to
simple.
I think improvments would be more warranted the this scenario.
I was thinking on relaying completely on the wiki system we use for
whole site. It can be done.
And I think we should add some sort of news system in which we will
write what actually happens inside the project, so it don't seem dead.
If we add ability to comment those news it will be like saying to
users "we care about what you think!". User-frendliness. This can be
done by using plugin for the wiki system.
Generally the archlinux site is a great inspiration for me. It's
simple, looks good and has everything you need.