On 25 February 2012 12:25, Werner Joss <werner(a)hoernerfranzracing.de> wrote:
On Saturday 25 February 2012 18:06:00 Darrell Anderson
wrote:
GHNS is
cool.
I was thinking however, since scripts are small
in size, we could just at them as defaults. It doesn't
seem to be much overhead.
What do you guys think of that?
As I mentioned in a previous post, perhaps we vote and select a half
dozen
or dozen scripts to include in the default
packaging. The default is the
scripts are disabled but appear in the Settings configurations for the
new
user.
this would be ok, IMHO.
The remainder of any scripts we want to support
could be available at
the wiki.
well, that was the point where I think GHNS makes much more sense.
I don't think normal users would regularly search a wiki for addons for
individual applications.
This discussion now raises another point. If
Trinity supports a Get Hot
New
Stuff option, should we check through all of the
sources and update the
URL
to a Trinity location?
agreed - this way would also prevent to point to outdated/inexistent
locations, or those which are intended for kde4 only (thus incompatible
with
trinity).
Werner
Many parts of the kde-look website have seperate subsections for kde3.X
series
items. For example window manager styles exists for 3 and 4.
I think in those cases it does not nee to be removed, and there is a lot of
older themes and utilities out there that could be good.
Calvin