2011/12/16 E. Liddell <ejlddll(a)googlemail.com>om>:
On Fri, 16 Dec 2011 17:55:47 +0100
L0ner sh4dou <sh4dou(a)gmail.com> wrote:
2011/12/16 Calvin Morrison
<mutantturkey(a)gmail.com>om>:
>
>
> On 16 December 2011 11:27, E. Liddell <ejlddll(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 15 Dec 2011 20:20:11 -0500
>> Calvin Morrison <mutantturkey(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > On 15 December 2011 19:45, L0ner sh4dou <sh4dou(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Not using databases is a big problem, since it practically
>> > > constrains
>> > > you to use static pages.
>> > >
>> > Basically - why is is this so bad?
>>
>> Depends on what we're trying to achieve. Dynamic pages ease certain
>> types of collaboration and user-added content, but static pages are
>> not
>> intrinsically evil and put less of a load on the server.
>
>
> Both can be good, If anything I'd do a bit of both.
>
> Simple php/html + a commenting system.
>
> here is a good example of very basic and yet has dynamic elements:
>
http://incise.org/htpicker.html
It uses disqus for the comments, for which I have mixed feelings. I'd
rather not relay on external services for parts of the website.
I think Calvin was advocating the general concept, not the specific
implementation. I'm sure we can find an open-source, locally-hostable
comment system that requires only PHP, HTML4/XHTML1, and
CSS<=2 (and if we can't, I'm sure I'm not the only one here
capable of creating such a system if it turns out to be both useful
and necessary).
That would be nice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
trinity-devel-unsubscribe(a)lists.pearsoncomputing.net
For additional commands, e-mail:
trinity-devel-help(a)lists.pearsoncomputing.net
Read list messsages on the Web archive: