13 Nov
2011
13 Nov
'11
11:19 p.m.
On 13 November 2011 11:05, Ilya Chernykh <anixxsus(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Sunday 13 November 2011 19:59:20 Julius
Schwartzenberg wrote:
You were assigned this bug because (Tim?) thought you were going to fix the
API in your KDE:KDE3 repository, so we were hoping to incorporate patches
from your tree. You then marked "CLOSED/WON'TFIX" and wrote "I am not
a
Trinity developer. I will not fix it in Trinity."
That said, can we leave this be? I do not understand why you persist! FOSS
is all voluntary. If you don't like Timothy or his method, you're free to
leave. If you want to help the project you need to 'play by the rules' so
to speak. If you want to tear down the project and condemn us to the fiery
depths of Hell, so be it. But then please do not do so on our mailing
lists.
Calvin Morrison
I agree here that Timothy's comment calling
KDE:KDE3 obsolete is
inappropriate. It seems he felt your response was harsh, but this does
not make it appropriate for him to respond in such a way. I would have
only expected a response asking for a diff.
I understand it seemed inappropriate to you to be assigned to a bug in
Trinity's bugzilla?
Of course it is strange to be assigned a bug and at the same time be
banned, is not it?
If you want developers, you do not ban them.