15 Oct
2012
15 Oct
'12
11:10 p.m.
He clearly said "in practical terms". I think that much is clear.
I dont understand the big deal about binary compatiblity. Its a buzzword
and has much less realistic benefit than purported.
Darrell stand behind your statement lad!
On Oct 15, 2012 6:17 PM, "Jekyll Wu" <adaptee(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 2012年10月16日 02:39, Darrell Anderson wrote:
In practical terms, Trinity is a continuation of
KDE 3.5.10
I'm sorry, but I have to say you(Trinity) are not. KDE promises binary
compatibility and you(Trinity) breaks it. Is that called continuation ?
Pretending and disclaiming you are a continuation of KDE3 would eventually
only bring more bad names to you(Trinity) and probably KDE.
Face and acknowledge the truth: You are a fork, and everybody already
knows.
Seriously, is that so hard and shameful?
Regards
Jekyll
------------------------------**------------------------------**---------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: trinity-devel-unsubscribe@**
lists.pearsoncomputing.net<trinity-devel-unsubscribe(a)lists.pearsoncomputing.net>
For additional commands, e-mail: trinity-devel-help(a)lists.**
pearsoncomputing.net <trinity-devel-help(a)lists.pearsoncomputing.net>
Read list messages on the web archive: http://trinity-devel.**
pearsoncomputing.net/ <http://trinity-devel.pearsoncomputing.net/>
Please remember not to top-post: http://trinity.**
pearsoncomputing.net/mailing_**lists/#top-posting<http://trinity.pearson…