Re: [trinity-devel] Re: TDE new logo proposal??

On Tuesday 08 March 2016, 22:44 wrote Lisi Reisz: There is no intent to be offensive -- but for me English is not a native language, which makes it quite difficult in a heated discussion to hit the exactly correct tone. So in your perception I'm not part of the "we"? My opinion is my opinion, and by definition a opinion is very obviously not a fact. (Even that my opinion is my opinion is not an incontrovertible fact, given convincing arguments ...) But here some facts, I based my conclusions on: Four surveys of desktop usage from a German Linux magazine. (of course the German speaking countries are know for disproportional large KDE usage, so there is a bias). The surveys were done 2016, 2014, 2012, 2010 -- thus covering enough time to see some developments: http://www.pro-linux.de/umfragen/2/300/welchen-desktop-nutzen-sie-ueberwieg… http://www.pro-linux.de/umfragen/2/195/welchen-desktop-nutzen-sie-ueberwieg… http://www.pro-linux.de/umfragen/2/95/welche-desktop-umgebung-nutzen-sie-ue… http://www.pro-linux.de/umfragen/2/6/welche-desktop-umgebung-nutzen-sie-bev… I consolidated this to the following tables, but you might prefer the original survey links given above: 2010 2012 2014 2016 Cinnamon - - 4% 9% Enlightenment 1% 1% 1% 0% GNUstep 0% - - - Gnome 2/MATE 31% 14% 4% 4% Gnome 3 - 13% 12% 19% KDE 3/Trinity 5% 2% 1% 1% KDE 4 54% 42% 42% 20% Plasma 5 - - - 19% LXDE 1% 2% 4% 2% XFCE 4% 11% 16% 20% Unity - 8% 10% 3% others 5% 8% 6% 7% Now see how the two champions Gnome and KDE were significantly loosing ground with their follies (and as the 2016 survey is from February I expect many Plasma5 users yet to loose patience and switch ...) That shows, IMHO, clearly that many users want to have a classical, stable, functional, ergonomic desktop. This lead to a proliferation of desktops -- IMHO opinion detrimental, as it binds and splits resources. XFCE is prominently profiting from this -- not undeserving, as it has massively improved since 2011, when I last tried it. While it was clearly inferior to KDE3 2011, it is now quite on par with TDE -- lacking in some areas, better in others. Given that -- IMHO -- TDE is still having a competive edge in many areas, the interesting questions are: * Why does TDE not benefit from the user migration away from Gnome and KDE??? * Especially, why did TDE not soak up the migrating users and soared between 2010 and 2012 and perhaps 2014, when it was clearly superior to XFCE (which soared)? My conclusions are known, what are your's? (2nd person, plural -- as would be unmistakable in German ;-) It is by no means bad to be a small desktop, and even small desktops (like LXDE or LXQT or even Enlightenment!) are supported as official OpenSuSE desktops. That would give Trinity Desktop access to resources -- so that is something I would like to try to achieve (especially if we could join forces with the remnants of their KDE3.5 team)! I was not knowing this fact -- until now. You mentioned you were asked, but not by whom. (But I see not how this fact contributes to the discussion) Probably not -- see below. They are completely free to voice their opinion, add new arguments and help as to identify all chances, risks, pitfalls to find a good decision for the project. Actually, I would appreciate if the silent majority would speak. No, I definitely do not want "change for change's sake" -- as stated often and in many variations (I don't know how to express this any clearer in English). Hopefully you do not want "stasis for stasis's sake". Because "stasis for stasis's sake" is as stupid and deadly as "change for change's sake" ... You state this as a fact!? If this is a fact (or even a probable outcome) -- I'll stop immediately. Actually I considered stopping on the grounds of many intelligent people currently wasting a lot of time -- and only your next statement compelled me to answer: This is a serious imputation, far beyond purely offending! I read, that this project is about "stasis" and "nostalgia" (well, that is benevolent rephrasing) in a lot of places, but so far not on the project's own Web-site. Maybe I missed something. If there is no change wanted, please be so kind to state this prominently in a mission statement or project charter or whatever the correct and non- inflammatory term is. It will surely protect the project from people like me -- in their enthusiasm -- doing anything active which could be construed as "foisting" their sinister "designs" of "change for change's sake" by chosing "garish deliberately M$- Windows"-like designs (like blue buttons, blue splash screens, blue background -- oops, that is status-quo, sorry, mixed that up, of course sparingly using the colors red/green/blue) That is fine with me. Best regards, ThoMaus -- In the Internet nobody knows you smell of sulphur ];-)