7 Mar
2016
7 Mar
'16
6:36 a.m.
On 03/07/2016 07:33 AM, E. Liddell wrote:
I'd say give it a couple more weeks, then call a
vote (with "keep the existing
logo" as one of the choices, just in case it has overwhelming support) to thin
the ranks. Then approach Tim with the top ~3 if he hasn't weighed in yet
at that point--ultimately, he has veto rights.
That is a good idea.
+1
Cheers
Michele