tde-devels

devels@trinitydesktop.org

3 participants
3808 discussions

Re: [trinity-devel] What about existing links in "tips" and "help" to kde.org?
by Timothy Pearson 03 Mar '11

03 Mar '11

> On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Timothy Pearson > <kb9vqf(a)pearsoncomputing.net >> wrote: > >> > Guys, >> > >> > Here is just a thought. How do you want to handle links in the >> current >> > code to >> > "kde.org"? I have seen several already in the "tips" window, like: "If >> you >> > would >> > like to contribute your own tip of the day, go to ....kde.org" >> > >> > Generically, I'm sure there are more in "help", etc. that refer to >> > kde.org >> > links intended for kde3 that are no longer there. >> > >> > Do we want to try and do anything with them? >> > >> >> Yes we do. We should probably have a tip submission system, but I think I >> may wait for the new website. Off the top of my head I'd put it at http://tips.trinitydesktop.org, but I don't own that domain yet. >> >> > You do now :) Yes :) I got to thinking that I didn't want some automated domain purchaser snatching it for resale because it was mentioned on a public website (the mailing list and IRC logs). I won't be activating it until the new website is complete (hopefully soon!). Tim

5 6

What about existing links in "tips" and "help" to kde.org?
by David C. Rankin 03 Mar '11

03 Mar '11

Guys, Here is just a thought. How do you want to handle links in the current code to "kde.org"? I have seen several already in the "tips" window, like: "If you would like to contribute your own tip of the day, go to ....kde.org" Generically, I'm sure there are more in "help", etc. that refer to kde.org links intended for kde3 that are no longer there. Do we want to try and do anything with them? -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.

3 2

bugs.pearsoncomputing.net - DNS entry causing confirmation email to be rejected by postfix 'reject_unknown_client'
by David C. Rankin 03 Mar '11

03 Mar '11

Tim, I went to register for the bugzilla and found that the confirmation request from 74.84.118.181 was rejected by postfix because 74.84.118.181 does not provide a proper reverse lookup causing: smtpd_client_restrictions = reject_rbl_client sbl.spamhaus.org, reject_unknown_client It is 'reject_unknown_client' causing the rejection. From: http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html the rejection is caused when: 1) the client IP address->name mapping fails, 2) the name->address mapping fails, or 3) the name->address mapping does not match the client IP address. I'm no postfix expert, but to let the confirmation through, I just removed 'reject_unknown_client'. If there have been people who don't get the confirmation emails, this may one reason why :) The actual postfix rejection was: Feb 28 16:22:21 nirvana postfix/smtpd[6858]: warning: 74.84.118.181: address not listed for hostname pearsoncomputing.net Feb 28 16:22:21 nirvana postfix/smtpd[6858]: connect from unknown[74.84.118.181] Feb 28 16:22:22 nirvana postfix/smtpd[6858]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from unknown[74.84.118.181]: 450 4.7.1 Client host rejected: cannot find your hostname, [74.84.118.181]; from=<bugs(a)pearsoncomputing.net> to=<snip> proto=ESMTP helo=<vali.starlink.edu> Feb 28 16:22:22 nirvana postfix/smtpd[6858]: disconnect from unknown[74.84.118.181] Somebody smart with postfix and bind can probably tell you what the exact issue is. Just looking, I see a helo from vali.starlink.edu and the "warning: 74.84.118.181: address not listed for hostname pearsoncomputing.net" -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.

2 9

kdevelop cmake-gui broke in last day or two - no libQtGui.so.4?? (I didn't delete it...)
by David C. Rankin 02 Mar '11

02 Mar '11

Guys, cmake-gui in Trinity broke within just the last day or so. I know, because I was running it not 2 days ago. I went to start it tonight and got the following error: cmake-gui: error while loading shared libraries: libQtGui.so.4: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory. Huh? It was just working one or two rebuilds ago. I have confirmed on both i686 and x86_64. I haven't changed anything in the way I'm building it. So something is amiss. I've grepped the package lists for 'libQtG' and there is none to be found in any of the packages. I'm guessing it is supposed to be provided by Qt3, but I've looked at that package list and there is no libQtG anything. I'm perplexed and where this problem lies -- or what I did to create it? Help? Let me know if you want a bug report. Thanks. -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.

3 5

Trinity packages for Arch
by Albert Vaca 02 Mar '11

02 Mar '11

Hi guys! I've updated Chakra's kdemod3 packages to Trinity 3.5.12 and I would like it to be added to the list of distributions with prebuilt packages. This is the thread in the Arch forums about the project: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=97612 Best regards, Albert Vaca

5 25

kdepim FTBS
by Serghei Amelian 02 Mar '11

02 Mar '11

Hi Tim, kdepim/kaddressbook/interfaces/extensionwidget.cpp:58:40: error: 'class KABC::AddressBook' has no member named 'tqfindByUid' -- Serghei

2 1

Re: [trinity-devel] ldebase - login manager default fonts and distro neutral Greeting
by Calvin Morrison 28 Feb '11

28 Feb '11

Of course! If it is a bug then it should be filed immediately. The point of the bug tracker is to keep things organized. This is a smaller issue so unless it is in the tracker it maybe overlooked. Definitely file that baby. Calvin Morrison

2 1

ldebase - login manager default fonts and distro neutral Greeting
by David C. Rankin 28 Feb '11

28 Feb '11

Next time somebody is in the code near the default settings for Login Manager, have a look at the font size and Greeting line. The current fonts are 22 pt for the Greeting, 10 pt for Failures, and 10 pt for General. I would propose 14, 10, 8. The current greeting welcomes you to Ubuntu. I would propose Trinity? I'll update the default proposals on the wiki as well -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.

7 11

last post for the Trinity weekend - applications status chart
by David C. Rankin 28 Feb '11

28 Feb '11

Whew, I'm done for the weekend :) Attached is a chart showing the current state of the applications/... cmake ports as well as the errors I encountered trying to build the ones with the old CMakeLists.txt files. (these are just notes I took working through the applications directory) The chart should be self-explanatory. If there is an 'x' in the CMake Port column, that just means a CMakeLists.txt file exists (not necessarily a Trinity CMakeLists.txt file). If there is a date under the Date column, then I was able to build it on Arch. The errors encountered in building are listed in the Error Description column. Ignore the last column. The openoffice calc file is here: http://www.3111skyline.com/dl/dt/trinity/arch/doc/app-cmake-port.ods It would be helpful to keep some type of running list on the status of the port effort. (it may already exist - dunno) Great job to all on Trinity. It's really looking good. -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.

1 0

Trinity Road Plan
by Darrell Anderson 28 Feb '11

28 Feb '11

Are there plans to start focusing and resolving issues reported in the bugzilla? If so, when (what is the road plan)? Thanks. Darrell

3 2

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

tde-devels