Hi
another question that popped up when working on syncevolution plugins was
the future of dbus.
https://www.mail-archive.com/syncevolution%40syncevolution.org/msg05071.html
It looks like it is getting replaced by gdbus and I found that libraries
are linked to dbus-1 for some reason I do not understand.
Example
ldd /opt/trinity/lib/libkaddressbook.so | grep dbus
libdbus-1-tqt.so.0 => /usr/lib/libdbus-1-tqt.so.0
(0x00007fb69ebb2000)
libdbus-1.so.3 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdbus-1.so.3
(0x00007fb69d452000)
ldd /opt/trinity/lib/trinity/libkaddressbookpart.so | grep dbus
libdbus-1-tqt.so.0 => /usr/lib/libdbus-1-tqt.so.0
(0x00007f61da129000)
libdbus-1.so.3 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdbus-1.so.3
(0x00007f61d89c9000)
What are the plans and what can we do in future?
thanks and regards
Hi again,
I'm sorry to bother you again with this, but I asked once how I can add a
testing target.
I started then working on this tdepim libkcal testing stuff again. I still
have some issues when my "SUMMARY" or "DESCRIPTION" of event or todo are in
cyrillic. Unfortunately I was/am busy at work and I lost all threads ....
perhaps you know this feeling ... getting older.
I also found the key to building testing targets
DEB_MAKE_CHECK_TARGET=testing fakeroot debian/rules build
so I think the next exercise (may be long term one) would be to revive the
check/testing code laying around.
I think I have a good plan
1. fix the libkcal issue "SUMMARY" - "DESCRIPTION"
2. build syncevolution deb packages for TDE
3. fix the libkcal test cases (now a lot of them fail on some date issue -
perhaps because originally there was a local zoneinfo data included in the
code and now it is not there)
4. start migrating testing to CMake (first in the packages I already have
worked with)
what do you think?
regards
Hi,
I would like to see Trinity on FreeBSD, so I subscribed to see what I
can do. Please let me know how I can help. I run FreeBSD and can
code, although I don't have a lot of experience with kernel level
programming.
Thanks
Mark Moellering
Hi,
I was wondering how one can add a testing target in cmake just as it is done
in the Makfeile.am in tedelibs and tedepim. There you have
check-local: .......
but I don't know how to do it in cmake, so that it compiles but does not run
tests except you say make check-local.
I think general rule is required and probably added to the tde cmake. I or
we could then re-add the tests that were skipped when moving to cmake.
Hi,
can someone help quickly please. I am facing an issue with vCal format
conversion "quoted printable" and charset: UTF-8.
I git cloned the tdepim package and following previous instructions I
updated submodule for cmake.
I do mkdir testbuild ; cd testbuild; cmake ..; make but nothing happens.
What am I doing wrong? This same procedure worked for tdelibs and some other
packages.
I wanted to debug having the know how to add test capabilities - I wanted to
add testing for libkcal and wanted to compile but in vain.
Thanks in advance
PS: the problem is that fromString is not working (fails) for TODO.
Le 14/05/2016 11:58, Felix Miata a écrit :
>
> > The "trinity-libarts-akode" package requires the library
> > "libakode.so.2", which is supposed to be provided by "trinity-akode"
> > package.
> > In your case, zypper found that it was provided by "libakode".
>
> > Notice that the Trinity's package for Akode is split in several smaller
> > package, e.g. "trinity-akode" and several "libakode_xxx".
>
> > I do not even have any 'libakode' package available in my 42.1
> > installation,
>
> I didn't expect anyone would, since there is no such package in 42.1
> repos for zypper to find.
>
> > so where does it come from ?
> > Maybe it is inherited from a previous opensuse release that you have
> > upgraded , or it comes from another 3rd party repository...
>
> 42.1 in this case is an upgrade (zypper dup) from _Factory_ (before
> the name change to Tumbleweed, from an installation last upgraded as
> Factory in December 2014). What I don't understand is how to get rid
> of the libakode package when the package manager claims other packages
> depend on it. Will rpm -e --nodeps not break the TDE packages that
> zypper claims depend on it? Why doesn't zypper recognize the trinity*
> package(s) you mention as providing the required libs? Are the Trinity
> packages broken WRT dependencies?
Yes, you can forcibly remove the libakode package (rpm -e --nodeps) and
then install trinity-akode , it won't break your system;.
It is likely that 'libakode' was installed before Trinity on your
computer, and the 'trinity-akode' does not obsolete 'libakode', so it
was kept intact.
François
Hi,
I'm not sure which of both (Kontact or KNotes) is causing the problem,
however when I add/change/delete a note in one of them, the other is not
notified and does not update.
Do you know how this works - I would guess via part? I think it is worth
looking into, but perhaps you know more than me as I'm at level 0.
regards
# rpm -qa | grep kode
libakode-2.0.2-419.1.x86_64
trinity-kode-14.0.3-1.oss421.x86_64
trinity-libarts-akode-14.0.3-1.oss421.x86_64
# zypper se -s libakode
| libakode_jack_sink | package | 2:2.0.2-14.0.3_1.oss421 | x86_64 | TDE
| libakode_jack_sink-debuginfo | package | 2:2.0.2-14.0.3_1.oss421 | x86_64 | TDE
| libakode_mpeg_decoder | package | 2:2.0.2-14.0.3_1.oss421 | x86_64 | TDE
| libakode_mpeg_decoder-debuginfo | package | 2:2.0.2-14.0.3_1.oss421 | x86_64 | TDE
| libakode_pulse_sink | package | 2:2.0.2-14.0.3_1.oss421 | x86_64 | TDE
| libakode_pulse_sink-debuginfo | package | 2:2.0.2-14.0.3_1.oss421 | x86_64 | TDE
| libakode_src_resampler | package | 2:2.0.2-14.0.3_1.oss421 | x86_64 | TDE
| libakode_src_resampler-debuginfo | package | 2:2.0.2-14.0.3_1.oss421 | x86_64 | TDE
i | libakode | package | 2.0.2-419.1 | x86_64 | (System Packages)
# zypper rm libakode
Loading repository data...
Reading installed packages...
Resolving package dependencies...
The following 8 packages are going to be REMOVED:
libakode trinity-desktop trinity-juk trinity-kttsd trinity-kttsd-contrib-plugins trinity-libarts-akode trinity-tdeaccessibility
trinity-tdemultimedia
8 packages to remove.
After the operation, 7.1 MiB will be freed.
Continue? [y/n/? shows all options] (y): n
Normally, packages listed as "System Packages" with no corresponding available package
are those that have become obsolete. Why do these Trinity packages depend on a package
that is not currently available?
--
"The wise are known for their understanding, and pleasant
words are persuasive." Proverbs 16:21 (New Living Translation)
Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks!
Felix Miata *** http://fm.no-ip.com/
Hi again,
it would have been too nice to be true, but there is the next issue in the
chain.
When I wrote yesterday "I tested", I meant I build and installed deb and
restarted the virtual machine. I checked the address book and all the utf8
chars were still in place.
Today however I pressed the reload button and got all the utf8 converted
into ? signs (which is pointing to ascii conversion).
Looking into the code there is vcardformat and vcardformatimpl.
I finalized the vcardformat test which checks save and load, but all looks
good.
I am going to write a test for vcardformatimpl, but I am not even sure I'm
looking into the right direction.
Where and how do I find what is behind the reload button?
thanks