Kristofer, theres no posibvle that u said, please reaad about the 2 previosly mail from me, i explaint some importante issues about kde licences and GPL parts..
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 12:11 AM, Kristopher Gamrat pikidalto@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 7:16 PM, PICCORO McKAY Lenz mckaygerhard@gmail.com wrote:
Toqueror ????
O.o
i dont think so
maybe trinity for desktop name, and kfoo names change to qfoo,
referending
to QT backend based KDE libraries.
Quonqueror, Qonsole...
Somehow these still don't sound right. If we use the T idea, I seriously doubt people would want to use amaroT.
I still think if we rename them, we should at least pick something generic until we come up with a better name for rebranding, at least for the development versions in svn whilst we work on new names. Then we can rename stuff as we go along toward the rebranded stable release, concentrating mainly on the main stuff.
I still like KDE Classic though. Perhaps we can see about doing a co-operative with the KDE4 devs? I'm not sure where the co-op would be (other than helping them "sanitize" their code and in adding in old features they still need (once we're strong in numbers and have a few more releases), but if they keep all their new "plasma" and such, I doubt the two projects would actually merge for a KDE5).
-- Kris "Piki" Ark Linux Webmaster Trinity Desktop Environment Packager
To unsubscribe, e-mail: trinity-devel-unsubscribe@lists.pearsoncomputing.net For additional commands, e-mail: trinity-devel-help@lists.pearsoncomputing.net Read list messsages on the Web archive: http://trinity-devel.pearsoncomputing.net/ Please remember not to top-post: http://trinity.pearsoncomputing.net/mailing_lists/#top-posting