-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA224
All,
I wanted to let you know that the QuickBuild system has been restored to
full functionality. All builds are now proceeding normally.
Thank you again for your generosity in helping replace the failed chiller;
this would not have been possible without your support!
Tim
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iFYEARELAAYFAlM4qvUACgkQLaxZSoRZrGG7LQDgg+rOLPLVhGutFDhrpU0daEpd
Nx7UEdYoXdLMBQDgyFdCXrqdmSIzG24p0brhccbXkd8AoofjNJyMWw==
=yzeo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Considering how long almost all bug reports sit idle, the reminders are little more than spam.
That is my opinion too. Perhaps a reminder once a month would be good and would not be considered spam.
Cheers
Michele
Hi,
I had users (Baron, Tony) of my remaster telling me on the user mailling list that printing is now broken on my remaster.
It is mostly due to the fact that since PCLinuxOS is a rolling release, some librairies used are probably newer now than they were when the 3.5.13.2 packages has been built last summer.
François Andriot, is it possible for you to rebuild 3.5.13.2 againsts a fully updated PCLinuxOS system please, so that the users will receive it in their updates?
I will also re-remaster it with all the updates, and new stuff of course, since R14 release is to be in at least a few weeks or months.
Thank you very much!
-Alexandre
All,
in bug 2015 (http://bugs.pearsoncomputing.net/show_bug.cgi?id=2015) Darrell has pointed out several pictures that need rebranding from K to T.
Any one volunteering for doing it in his/her spare time? Those rebranding would go into v14.0.0 if we can get the new pictures ready in time.
Cheers
Michele
> Does this affect normal trinity users (i.e not developers) who only report bugs?
> Janek
I assume from your email that you are not receiving whining emails.
I think this affects whoever reports a bug in bugszilla and set him/herself as 'bug assignee'. If you are not getting any whining emails, that may be the reason. I am not sure 100% though, it depends on the contents of the whining script that is run daily.
Cheers
Michele
Dear all,
I recently had some discussions with Tim and Slavek about the bugszilla whining functionality, i.e. the "your bugszilla bug list needs attention" emails that are sent out automatically every day.
We would like to fine tune that, but first we need to know your opinion about it.
Here are some possible options to choose from:
1) the whining emails are reeeeeally useful, please spam my mailbox every 5 minutes so I won't forget what bug I am supposed to be working on instead of spending my time deleting emails.
2) the whining emails are useful and the current setting is ok.
3) the whining emails are useful but the frequency of the remainder is too high (currently daily). It would be better if the emails were sent weekly/bi-weekly/monthly/every 3 months/every 6 months/once a year/once every 5 years....
4) the whining emails are useless to me but they don't affect me.
5) the whining emails are useless to me and would prefer not to receive them if possible.
6) please stop sending me those useless stuff. Pleeeeeeeease!! Really, please!
Looking forward to your opinions, so that we can fine tune the settings in the best way.
Cheers
Michele
Hi all,
in light of the recent problems on the build-farm, I used the fact that
ever since work on v3.5.13-sru I have the automated preparation of source
packages and at the same time I have a private builder where I am doing
the test building, and where I have available all supported Debian and
Ubuntu distributions (for example, see my test for building on Ubuntu
Trusty). I optimize my production line for building packages, so now I
have ready alternative APT source containing packages for all supported
Debian and Ubuntu distributions.
The same packages will be in the future uploaded to my PPA on build-farm,
where they will serve as maintanance releases for R14. Similarly, as was
my PPA for v3.5.13-sru branch. Therefore, this apt source I call 'R14
preliminary stable-builds'. In order that the packages were readily
available, they are synced to my primary mirror.
What to do if you want to use it?
1) Add the source to sources.list:
deb http://mirror.xcer.cz/trinity-sb *distribution-name* deps-r14 main-r14
2) From some public GPG keyserver download my key and import it into APT:
sudo apt-key adv --keyserver pks.gpg.cz --recv-keys ED1F4884
3) Update the packages in such a way as you used to do it :)
I hope it will be helpful.
--
Slavek
Is there a way to query the full source tree to assemble a list of all possible "kiosk" related restrictions?
Or which apps support restrictions?
There are two README files in the source tree, but the files seem incomplete:
tdelibs/tdecore/README/kiosk
tdebase/konsole/README.konsole_kiosk
Neither README is installed in the final tdelibs or tdebase packages.
The README files indicate there are three major groupings (kdeglobal):
[KDE Action Restrictions]
[KDE Resource Restrictions]
[KDE URL Restrictions]
The kiosktool app does not seem to provide a method to assemble a full list of restrictions.
I am editing the Admin Guide. An appendix of all possible restrictions would be helpful.
Darrell
Hello,
I have some problem with kicker.
I explain :
- i use NX server ( freenx) to obtain a trinity desktop, i launch startkde.
- the user shutdown his session
- i have kicker process consuming memory even if the session is stoped
with a kdesktop_lock process.
Thanks for your help to understand why i have these processes.
Sincerely,
Jean Milot
--
Jean Milot - Directeur Technique
jmilot(a)dotriver.eu - www.dotriver.eu
Un terminal à 30€ ? testez un Raspberry PI http://bit.ly/1kx0wid
Avis d'expert Nr5 nu@ge France : http://bit.ly/MoE4f8
DotRiver est membre du consortium "nuage-France" http://bit.ly/LNIfMr
24 b rue Baldassini, F-69007 Lyon
Fixe: +33 (0)4 2746 39 80 Direct: # 87 Hotline: # 89 Fax: # 81
Mob: +33 (0)6 68 15 58 17
Pas à pas, agissons au quotidien pour préserver notre environnement.
N'imprimez que si nécessaire, réduisez vos déchets informatiques,
économisez l'énergie en utilisant les solutions DotRiver.
Tim,
what is the status of that broken chiller? If the donation have not been enough to cover for its replacement, do you think it would be possible to get it repaired instead?
Personally I don't need that chiller since I build on my own computer, but sure there are a lot of users/testers out there that have been relying on the nightly builds so far and would or could be affected by the lack of them if they don't use Wheezy or Trusty.
Just wondering.
Cheers
Michele