Updated late last night to the latest GIT. Fresh build of all packages.
Build failures in tdegames, tdevelop, tdewebdev, koffice with:
kgameprogress.moc:1: error: expected id-expression at end of input
layout.moc.cpp:100: error: expected id-expression at end of input
KDGanttMinimizeSplitter.cpp:56: error: expected id-expression before 'static'
Darrell
I'm using the latest GIT sources from the past couple of days. This is a full package set rebuilt.
I'm seeing may related error messages in the xsession log:
KAction::property( "icon" ) failed: property invalid or does not exist
KAction::setProperty( "icon", value ) failed: property invalid, read-only or does not exist
KAction::property( "name" ) failed: property invalid or does not exist
KAction::setProperty( "name", value ) failed: property invalid, read-only or does not exist
KToolBarPopupAction::property( "shortcut" ) failed: property invalid or does not exist
KToolBarPopupAction::setProperty( "shortcut", value ) failed: property invalid, read-only or does not exist
KToolBarPopupAction::property( "name" ) failed: property invalid or does not exist
KToolBarPopupAction::setProperty( "name", value ) failed: property invalid, read-only or does not exist
KToggleFullScreenAction::property( "shortcut" ) failed: property invalid or does not exist
KToggleFullScreenAction::setProperty( "shortcut", value ) failed: property invalid, read-only or does not exist
KToggleFullScreenAction::property( "name" ) failed: property invalid or does not exist
KToggleFullScreenAction::setProperty( "name", value ) failed: property invalid, read-only or does not exist
KonqMainWindow::property( "currentProfile" ) failed: property invalid or does not exist
KonqSidebarBrowserExtension::property( "urlDropHandling" ) failed: property invalid or does not exist
ListViewBrowserExtension::property( "urlDropHandling" ) failed: property invalid or does not exist
KBookmarkAction::setProperty( "url", value ) failed: property invalid, read-only or does not exist
KBookmarkAction::setProperty( "address", value ) failed: property invalid, read-only or does not exist
My previous full package set from Oct. 17 did not have this problem. So only a few patches qualify as the cause.
Darrell
Darrell, all,
In the patch for tdenetworks (attachment 926 / 927 in bug 1262) I solved that
with cmake are not installed some files into the 'doc' that were installed
with autotools:
+ knewsticker: TODO
+ kppp: costsgraphs.fig, kppp.faq.question, ttyS-cua.txt
+ krdc: authentication.eps, krdc_window.eps, preferences_profilestab.eps,
preferences_rdpdefaultstab.eps, preferences_vncdefaultstab.eps, snapshot.eps,
snapshot_connectionspeed.eps, snapshot_nobrowse.eps, snapshot_vncentry.eps
+ krfb: configuration_access.eps, configuration_network.eps,
configuration_session.eps, connection.eps, email_invitation.eps,
invitation_management.eps, personal_invitation.eps, screenshot.eps
For some files, I am not sure if this is considered a "source" and omission
when installing is right - desirable? For example 'fig' and 'eps' files.
Please, I need someone smarter to give me advice.
Slavek
--
Hi all,
in preparing the road map, I noticed that in tdelibs/tdecore/tdeversion.h are
the instructions for the version numbers different from the way we intended.
My proposal to change the description as follows:
AS IS:
======
/*
R <ABI VERSION> . <BUGFIX REVISION> . <SECURITY PATCHLEVEL>
Security patchlevel is not present on initial release
It is added on the first security release, starting with ".a"
".a" would correspond to a TDE_VERSION_RELEASE of 1, ".b" would be 2, etc.
A new bugfix revision resets the security level
A new ABI version resets both the bugfix revision and the security level
*/
CHANGE TO:
==========
/*
R <ABI VERSION> . <FEATURE REVISION> . <BUG AND SECURITY PATCH LEVEL>
Initial release is always R<ABI VERSION>.0.0.
BUG AND SECURITY PATCH LEVEL is always updated with a point release.
FEATURE REVISION is updated when new features are introduced or existing
features are significantly updated. A FEATURE REVISION release does NOT
include ABI changes.
A new FEATURE REVISION level always resets the BUG AND SECURITY PATCH
LEVEL.
A new ABI version resets both the FEATURE REVISION level and BUG AND
SECURITY PATCH LEVEL.
*/
What is your opinion?
Slavek
--
Hi all,
some time ago I was in the users mailing-list announced that I wanted to write
a proposal to work on new Trinity versions with GIT branches. To few initial
paragraphs were added the some next sections. And result is the draft for
plan to release R14.0.0 - road map. Because the proposal is longer, I placed
it on the Etherpad:
http://trinity.etherpad.trinitydesktop.org/39
As you all know, my English is not good - English is not my native language.
So at this point I would like to thank Darrell for help with the correction
of this proposal.
Your ideas and comments are welcomed.
Slavek
--
I receive the following message when I send an email with one of my email addresses:
The server certificate failed the authenticity test
The certificate is good to 2016, but something else must trigger this dialog. I don't know how the code logic inspects certificates to send those dialogs. Perhaps I have something configured incorrectly.
A second dialog prompts:
Would you like to accept this certificate forever without being prompted?
I select Forever but the next time I send an email I see the same dialogs, which implies kmail is not saving that option correctly.
Can anybody confirm this behavior? I don't see anything obvious in the bug tracker.
Darrell
It's a year and one release since rebranding rename of git packages and all
everything... But tarball packages placed on the ofitial page are still
named with kde- prefix.
The page I ment:
http://trinity.blackmag.net/releases/3.5.13.1/downloads.html.
Following the instructions for "For Precise [Ubuntu 12.04] LTS
(v3.5.13.1)" from:
http://www.trinitydesktop.org/wiki/bin/view/Documentation/UbuntuBinaryInsta….
I got these "Failed to fetch" messages with "apt-get update":
-----------
From:
http://ppa.quickbuild.pearsoncomputing.net/trinity/trinity-v3.5.13/ubuntu/d…
source/Sources
binary-amd64/Packages
binary-i386/Packages
Error: 404 Not Found
From:
http://ppa.quickbuild.pearsoncomputing.net/trinity/trinity-builddeps-v3.5.1…
/source/Sources
/binary-amd64/Packages
/binary-i386/Packages
Error: 404 Not Found
----------
I assume this is why I got so many "unmet dependencies" when I tried
"apt-get install"
Is there something wrong with the repository or is it something on my
end...?
ALSO:
I am trying to install Trinity on Lubuntu 12.04. Lubuntu was a fresh
install on a blank drive and has not been modified since the install.
Will using Lubuntu instead of Ubuntu, be a problem?
Keith
We provide no way for regular users to help us test the development branch.
Do we have a mechanism in place to upload daily/nightly/weekly builds from GIT?
If not then what needs to be done to provide that access? What about the GIT repo itself? For example, I notice the following directory:
http://git.trinitydesktop.org/cgit/tde-packaging/tree/slackware
Although intended for hosting build scripts and packaging information, why not a single set of binary packages too?
The packages would not be mirrored.
Darrell