I upgraded to stretch and testing 14.1 (DEV)
Unfortunately when trying to send a gpg signed message today I realized that
gpg is not working properly. I started from command line and saw message
gpg2 migration successfull. I also see a file .gpg-v21-migrated
When I start kgpg from command line it shows many line with invalid date.
Gpg however lists all keys with properly displayed date. Kgpg does not
display date or name assigned to key.
I managed to find out that the date in the key is a unix timestamp, but in
kgpg we have TQDate fromString with QT:ISODate, which forces fromString to
split the string instead using it as unix time stamp.
I did following to fix it
if (ret.gpgkeyexpiration.isEmpty())
ret.gpgkeyexpiration=i18n("Unlimited");
else {
TQDate date = TQDate::fromString(ret.gpgkeyexpiration,
Qt::ISODate);
if (!date.isValid()) {
TQDateTime timestamp;
timestamp.setTime_t(ret.gpgkeycreation.toInt());
date = timestamp.date();
}
However I need to look into why the names are not shown properly. Perhaps
we'll get a patch
Can you confirm this?
I created a Bug 2791
regards
Le 30/07/2017 à 20:53, Felix Miata a écrit :
>
> There is at least one reason for high DPI users not to upgrade Leap past 42.1:
>
> GTK3 apps not honoring system-wide DPI settings nor KDE mouse cursor
> https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1022830
> [GTK+ 3.18] UI text sizes no longer inherited from Linux system
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1269274
>
> The same reason applies to Stretch, all currently supported Fedoras, Ubuntu
> 16.04 & up, Mint 18+, anything that includes unpatched gtk >3.16.
>
> Last night I did a final update on one 42.1 system and had to use the TDE 42.2
> repos to do it. I understand killing 13.1 & 13.2, but not 42.1 or 42.2.
Hello, I did not know about this particular DPI problem ...
I did not think that anyone using the 42.x serie would keep the 42.1
which is now EOL, that's why I removed the package.
I left the 13.1 and 13.2 for users with old computers, and did not
upgrade to 42. (also there is no more 32 bits architecture on 42.x)
So, I've put back the 42.1 packages on the mirror, they will re-appear soon.
François
I can do the Wiki work, but how do I find out the actual current state, which
releases actually have existing repos? Has one for 42.3 been built? Is 42.1
already gone? Surely 13.1 and 13.2 are gone, but how can one know for sure?
--
"The wise are known for their understanding, and pleasant
words are persuasive." Proverbs 16:21 (New Living Translation)
Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks!
Felix Miata *** http://fm.no-ip.com/