---
crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware:
https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68
On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 8:23 PM, deloptes <deloptes(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Keith Daniels wrote:
My bias is anti systemd, just so you know.--
scant documentation and there
has never been a security review of its package.
Meanwhile the situation has improved.
by design it's never going to "improve".
https://ewontfix.com/14/
the problems you're encountering with lack of documentation are down
to pottering's pathological lack of comprehension of his
responsibilities as a software developer:
http://www.linux-magazine.com/Online/Blogs/Off-the-Beat-Bruce-Byfield-s-Blo…
don't get caught up in the "civility" part, that's a distraction.
no, there's no documentation because pottering *keeps adding more and
more to systemd*, making it a moving target, and, as PID 1, that's
incredibly dangerous. i wasn't previously aware that you can't even
upgrade without a reboot any more thanks to systemd being PID 1.
the more i learn about systemd the more shocked i become that people
don't realise how serious this really is.
l.